Boats_are_fun t1_jayhxn9 wrote on March 5, 2023 at 1:23 AM

#2,162,685

Wow that sucks

Tornado_Wind_of_Love t1_jayis7d wrote on March 5, 2023 at 1:30 AM

#2,162,712

Bombardier Challenger 300, my bet is on someone not wearing their seatbelt.

NHplanespotter t1_jaz76uz wrote on March 5, 2023 at 5:05 AM

#2,163,654

Looking at data, looks like they were climbing about 2,000 feet per minute, then got shot up to 7,000 feet per minute, then down to 0 in under a minute. That’s a wild ride

jrice39 t1_jb099xl wrote on March 5, 2023 at 1:06 PM

#2,164,788

Replying to NHplanespotter (#2,163,654)

Was your data from flightradar24?

gmcgath t1_jb0qjc7 wrote on March 5, 2023 at 3:34 PM

#2,165,510

Replying to Tornado_Wind_of_Love (#2,162,712)

It could also have been an unsecured heavy object. This is the first I've ever heard of an in-air death from turbulence, and it makes me wonder.

NHplanespotter t1_jb0xx0t wrote on March 5, 2023 at 4:29 PM

#2,165,856

Replying to jrice39 (#2,164,788)

No, FR24 does not have data available for this aircraft.

Keene, New Hampshire plane encounters turbulence: 1 dead

Comments