Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

smartest_kobold t1_j631ein wrote

Always nice to see a Proud Boy and landlord get convicted.

99

woolsocksandsandals t1_j63aehy wrote

I searched the punishment for the first charge she was convicted of, disorderly conduct in a Capitol building. This is from the top search result…

The penalty for violating 40 U.S.C. §5104(e)(1) is a felony conviction punishable by a fine or up to five years in prison, or both.

My hope for every one of these traitors is the most severe punishment allowable by US Law but unfortunately they always get off light.

30

Berzerk_Unit_Alpha t1_j63ax3q wrote

Lock her up! Lock her up! Lock her up! Lock her up! Lock her up! Lock her up!

10

V1198 t1_j63b3l4 wrote

Back when we were a stronger country traitors would be dealt with harshly enough to dissuade further nonsense. Sadly, since the end of the civil war, we’ve become soft.

22

SomeSortofDisaster t1_j63east wrote

>guilty of four charges, including... parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a Capitol building.

Truly an insurrection.

−33

bleucheese87 t1_j63eq4b wrote

Hudson, the Alabama of New Hampshire. As my MIL once said about Hudson "I've never seen so many people wear boots with shorts."

63

jrice39 t1_j63ggz5 wrote

I like how those who didn't storm the capital are now aristocrats. I guess I'll keep sipping my champagne cocktails up here in my palace as I continue figuring out how to afford another tank of heating oil. Get the fuck out of here.

49

lizyouwerebeer t1_j63hp3a wrote

disorderly conduct in a Capitol building, disorderly or disruptive conduct in a restricted building, entering or remaining in a restricted building or grounds, and parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a Capitol building.

That's all of her charges.

24

anotherposter76 t1_j63llhv wrote

The aristocrats who act above the law. If there was any justice in this society the peoples house would be stormed daily until the global bloodshed for profit is stopped and the corrupt swamp monsters are out of a job or in prison.

1

tech1010 t1_j63m069 wrote

How dare she go on a 90 minute meandering around the capital wearing a US flag after being let in by capital police.

Threat to democracy.

−39

[deleted] t1_j63m37s wrote

If I had to bet what town any Jan 6 attendees were from in NH, my first guess would be Hudson. My second guess would be Hudson again. Something ain't right about that town.

16

Glucose12 t1_j63mie2 wrote

About the level of charges I'd expect for somebody who participated in an unscheduled tour group.

Good Enough.

−31

asuds t1_j63mm1p wrote

So it was mOsTlY pEaCeFul then?

…with smashed windows and doors, shit in the rotunda, and breaking down the literal doors into the chambers? ok doke - guess we know your IQ.

27

asuds t1_j63mwdp wrote

Most group tours don’t shit on the floor of one of the most important buildings in the country…. but maybe that’s how you were raised. Unsurprising I guess given your comment.

16

[deleted] t1_j63n8l6 wrote

https://apnews.com/article/capitol-siege-florida-virginia-conspiracy-government-and-politics-6ac80882e8cf61af36be6c46252ac24c

After January 6, the million dollar question for me was, where were all their rifles?! Who attempts an unarmed coup in the US? Obviously all these chuds own more guns than teeth, right? But we have the answer to that question now. The feds just happened to bust their armory a few days before.

There's also the terrorist who attempted to plant a pipe bomb, who's still on the loose.

7

Glucose12 t1_j63njhz wrote

Profile checks out.

How many of the members of that Tour Group shit on the floor?

Are you talking about the 5-6 Antifa/FBI/CIA trouble-makers who entered first, and managed to get their precious photo-ops done?

Or are you talking about the majority who just wandered in afterwards after the Capitol Guard opened the doors for them. All of them staying inside the velvet ropes, like good orderly citizens taking a tour.

−39

basementfrog42 t1_j63omw4 wrote

showing our true purple-ness in these comments… for better or for worse. some of y’all are truly nutty

11

RedLeafRoy t1_j63qtrf wrote

Some people need to lay off the KoolAid

5

chain_me_up t1_j63r5mc wrote

I can't believe people still think Antifa is some secret organized group that constantly frames the MAGA idiots lmao. Antifa = anti fascism, why would anyone have a problem with being against fascism???

20

Glucose12 t1_j63rh2s wrote

Why would I waste the effort on you?

I'd tell you to look for it, but either you know perfectly well what I'm talking about and are being obtuse ... or you can't be bothered, which is why you failed to see it all the first time around.

If you -cared- you'd have already seen it, but you don't.

−22

asphynctersayswhat t1_j63rlox wrote

There was an insurrection that day. A failed one but you need to separate the sheep from the insurrection. Most of the idiots there that day were fooled into being a distraction while proud boys and oath keepers infiltrated the capitol. Just because the majority of the idiots there that day were incompetent and clueless about what was happening doesn’t change that people were in the capitol building, ready to use violence, to stop congress from conducting government business, certifying the election and upholding the will of the American people.

These rubes from Hudson are just idiots who worship a conman and got duped into this. But they don’t deserve sympathy. The maga are not our best. They aren’t our brightest.

15

arbrown83 t1_j63s7j4 wrote

Actually, it's neither. I didn't "see it the first time around" because it's not true. But keep believing in your conspiracy theories to make yourself feel better.

Edit: your "profile checks out" comment works both ways. Full of trump, conspiracy and religion posts. Typical.

15

CheliceraeJones t1_j63sjdv wrote

>a Hudson woman was found guilty on four charges related to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.
>
>disorderly conduct in a Capitol building
>
>disorderly or disruptive conduct in a restricted building
>
>entering or remaining in a restricted building or grounds
>
>and parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a Capitol building.

such violence

omg

lock this terrorist up

−24

Glucose12 t1_j63spyq wrote

I'd ask you to define the word Fascist - but I know perfectly well that your definition is the childish "anybody who disagrees with me".

A little tip for the child - just because a group of people give themselves a name, doesn't mean their behavior is expressive of that name.

−3

chain_me_up t1_j63tw74 wrote

Fascism: often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.

It combines elements of nationalism, militarism, economic self-sufficiency, and totalitarianism. It opposes communism, socialism, pluralism, individual rights and equality, and democratic government. Fascism places the importance of the nation above all else.

So no, my definition isn't "anyone who disagrees with me" lmao, I know how to use a dictionary and I'm also open to hearing factual information from other sides. It just so happens that "sources" like fox news or the Babylon bee are not legitimate so I don't buy into the propaganda they try to spin as facts and evidence. It's almost like when I'm presented with facts and knowledge, I can learn and potentially even change my views to match with the facts, wow!! Give it a shot sometime.

15

chain_me_up t1_j63uy8p wrote

You literally just proved my point, antifa is not a group, it's a belief. Anyone can claim they are antifa (as seen by all people with their insane belief that "antifa" members snuck into the capitol to frame the insurrectionists) and create chaos. The people who entered the capitol committed treason and attempted a coup, they were Trump supporters doing whatever they could to keep their dear cheeto in office, not liberals trying to make people look bad. They WERE bad.

9

Glucose12 t1_j63vpow wrote

I know you and the rest of you are just more crummy little trolls, who probably don't live in New Hampshire, and were monitoring this all-too-obvious Trap Post waiting for a chance to strike down on anybody responding with even the tiniest resistance to the theme.

You twerps are obvious, but I decided to bite, regardless. Feel free to continue festering.

0

Glucose12 t1_j63xpul wrote

So precious.

SO, to reiterate, because 1) you can parrot a definition, and 2) a certain group uses a particular name, then that means that 3) the behavior of that group actually is representative of the meaning in their chosen name?

0

chain_me_up t1_j63y9qh wrote

No, but you claimed there was 5-6 antifa agents who framed the people going into the capitol. I haven't seen a single reputable source with information on this, do you have any links? I believe we're technically agreeing that claiming to be a member of a certain viewpoint doesn't mean you uphold it. But the difference is, I'm referring to your fake antifa scapegoats that you say existed to frame insurrectionists. They were not antifa members (antifa isn't a group), everyone involved in breaching the capitol is an insurrectionist. They did it for Trump and they are most certainly not against fascism, they literally tried to prop him up as a dictator.

9

Glucose12 t1_j640k5v wrote

My specific wording was "Antifa/FBI/CIA". IE, "whatever".

IE, simply saying that they were people who were not part of the general milling assemblage of MAGA protesters.

IE, the instigators.

You latched on to only one word out of those three.

That says more about you. I SEEEEEE YOUUUU. :-D

1

LordMongrove t1_j642o2p wrote

That sounds like hard projection to me.

Literally only group that considers anybody their "god emperor" are Trumpists. It's just like calling the rest of us "sheep". More projection.

Perhaps a little reflection is in order.

20

FelangyRegina t1_j644no6 wrote

Good. Byeeeeeeeee. See you in 56 months, hope no one needs you at home!

7

vexingsilence t1_j645psc wrote

I'd love to know how much the FBI spent to go after people like this, whom they could only charge with what amounts to trespassing. Meanwhile, the politicians themselves are frequently involved in illegal shit and the FBI tends to be completely useless in those cases.

−14

flh1200-1965 t1_j645twj wrote

And yet the weapons were not even in DC. They were in Virginia. Doesn't seem to me if they wanted an insurrection, they would leave them behind. And let's be real, if the police or federal agents had started shooting, all of DC would have been in immediate lockdown. Those guns would never have made it into DC. Use your free thinking brain.

−5

flh1200-1965 t1_j646n7z wrote

You should all be more concerned about a true overthrow of our constitution by a WEF, one world government, and what they have planned. Instead of a distraction, that if it was an insurrection, was the wimpiest plan for an insurrection ever formulated. It's a distraction, people. Pay attention to what is really going on.

−18

tech1010 t1_j649lsz wrote

It was more “mostly peaceful” than the protests for the druggy George Floyd were by several orders of magnitude.

My iq is 142, thank you for your concern though.

−13

gn84 t1_j64amxn wrote

Where's the ACLU?

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/12/21/572654087/jury-finds-first-batch-of-inauguration-protesters-not-guilty-of-riot-charges

>The American Civil Liberties Union of D.C., which filed an amicus brief in support of the defendants and has sued the D.C. police department over officers' actions during the inauguration protests, celebrated the verdict.

>"Today's verdict reaffirms two central constitutional principles of our democracy: First, that dissent is not a crime, and second, that our justice system does not permit guilt by association," senior staff attorney Scott Michelman said in a statement. "No one should have to fear arrest or prosecution for coming to the nation's capital to express opinions peacefully, no matter what those opinions may be."

−2

gn84 t1_j64b2sc wrote

The censorship and self-censorship has resulted in large numbers of people for real not knowing what you're talking about.

We're literally living in a world with two (or more) completely different perceptions of reality.

4

Glucose12 t1_j64hqxf wrote

I'm glad you added the "(or more)". I was going to say! Two may not be enough. :-D

​

I remember bookmarking a lot of posts on my twitter account with videos and photos from peoples personal phones, taken during the J6 event. Saved a few to my laptop, but assumed the bookmarked tweets would be useful reference material later.

Then I(and most of the accounts who published that material) got banned from twitter for a variety of "misdeeds".

Ref material lost - like tossing it into the ocean. Which of course is what Twitter wanted, as well as those parts of the government making requests to Twitter staff.

0

Aggravating-Future74 t1_j64iwwk wrote

Lol! Oh, I hope she regrets ever following the cult. How many people got their trading cards? XD

2

Darwins_Dog t1_j64ldq7 wrote

In most cases this is probably all they can prove. I kinda prefer fines to prison though. Most aren't dangerous (just easily misled) and it costs us a lot of money to lock them up. The ringleaders better get prison time, but the rest can just pay through the nose.

2

asuds t1_j64sftn wrote

oh right I forgot that every bad thing ever was actually Antifa soldiers secretly flow in from the Ukraine who infiltrated every single pro-trump group. They made sure their misdeeds were caught on video and are now doing time just to trick the world into thinking crazy drunk hicks did bad things.

Such a simple plan!

2

Glucose12 t1_j64zmfp wrote

Sorry little person, but I've lived here in NH, probably longer than you've been alive. You sound like a Massachusetts import. All bluster, and no calm, cool rationality.

0

StaysForDays t1_j65dfsj wrote

Alabama ranks second poorest in the US, has the second worst schools, and has the second highest per capita residents on welfare. Also, they rank #3 in obese residents per capita.

At least they're not Mississippi! (Which ranks first in those categories)

3

woolsocksandsandals t1_j65fvem wrote

For most things I would agree with you but for these traitors I say lock them up and forget about them. Every single person who gained unauthorized access to the Capitol building that day should at least get years in prison. Even the ones that turn snitch.

Also, people who are easily misled are the most dangerous people there are.

−2

vexingsilence t1_j65kpsa wrote

I saw a protest that got out of control followed by some incidents of assault and theft. Don't know what you saw.

The person this article is about wasn't found guilty of anything other than trespassing, phrased different ways. By modern reporting standards, this was a mostly peaceful protest.

−1

spiral_in t1_j65kxvn wrote

A mob whipped up by a lying gameshow host used violence to attempt to subvert the will of the voters and install an autocrat. People died, cops were hurt, people were crushed. Fuck off with your pile of lies.

5

vexingsilence t1_j65lhfo wrote

Yet again, the person in this article was only charged with trespassing. How could that be? If it was so obvious what everyone saw, why isn't everyone being prosecuted that way? Seems like the lies are on your side.

1

spiral_in t1_j65n28k wrote

Again, the issue is that the OP was suggesting that because this woman wasn't charged with something like battery or seditious conspiracy that calling the events of the day an "insurrection" was invalid. There's plenty of evidence and charges showing that it was, but you're clinging to the big-brain idea that if this one person wasn't charged as such, or not all where, it wasn't an insurrection. Keep moving those goalposts around, I'm sure you'll stumble into coherence eventually.

1

vexingsilence t1_j65ph0m wrote

>There's plenty of evidence and charges showing that it was

No one was charged with treason or insurrection. A small number had charges of "sedition conspiracy", very few were found guilty of that. You can count them on two hands. I'd have to dig deeper, but I wouldn't be surprised if those were plea deals rather than the government actually proving it.

For the vast majority of the people that the FBI spent a fortune trying to find, it was relatively minor stuff. They didn't even try to burn the building down, unlike the "mostly peaceful" protests that had plagued the country. It's pretty hard to see the witch hunt as anything other than political persecution.

1

skullshank t1_j65qz4v wrote

im curious about this too. weve lived in hudson for about 18 years and while we do see our fair share of fjb shit, ive never gotten the sense its overtly trashy or overrun with political crazies. maybe im just naive or ignorant.

5

[deleted] t1_j6630is wrote

That doesn’t make any sense, but nice try. Are you referencing aristocrats in the context of wealthy Southerners who wanted to continue to profit off slavery? Bc fun fact: there was plenty of wealth in the North, too. They coined the phrase “Boston Brahmin” a year before the war started, as a way to refer to Boston’s most respected/elite wealthy families… some of whom were quite literally married to aristocrats.

1

Glucose12 t1_j668ttm wrote

Reading comprehension. It's no surprise you not only can't read and understand, but you obviously won't have the IQ to (WRT the media) read between the lines, spot the holes in the spin, or in general Wake The Fuck Up and see the scam.

Or you're part of the scam. Are you angry? You sound angry. Why?

0

nobbyv t1_j66bszc wrote

My reading comprehension is fine, thanks.

> I remember bookmarking a lot of posts on my twitter account with videos and photos from peoples personal phones, taken during the J6 event. Saved a few to my laptop,

This is you, right, you absolute fucking muppet? Where are these saved Tweets that support your allegations?

2

Glucose12 t1_j66d3sr wrote

So angry. Angry little social refuse.

I made it clear that most of my ref material died along with my(and others) twitter accounts. But you missed that, I guess.

You do understand that your insane ranting at me is probably outside the specs of this sub(?)

Or perhaps, like the irritated, poisonous serpent you are, you're hoping to make me do/say something that will get me blocked here?

Good Luck, son. Feel free to bring this "Rash" to an end. Of course, you won't be able to help yourself.

0

Different_Ad7655 t1_j66ezo3 wrote

Except remember, that the South voted as a block democratic for almost a century because the hatred of the party of Lincoln was so strong. Even though the Democrats in the late 19th century with a party of labor and in the 20th century progressivism, nonetheless the Democratic vote of the southern block be counted on until civil rights. It was a bitter pill that the Democratic party took and of course the right thing, but it cost the Democratic party dearly and has never quite recovered. Every one of those states now is firmly in the grip of the GOP

0

Wide_Television_7074 t1_j6724kg wrote

the language used in these articles is so dramatic, it’s kinda embarrassing that there are people that will treat this as a historical event — it was a rally that got out of control, people! lol

−7

nobbyv t1_j6756c7 wrote

Do you know the chick that works the Dunks at the gas station where you go to get your coffee every morning doesn’t actually give a flaming fuck about what crazy thing you saw on the TV last night? She’s just too polite to tell you that you’re an insignificant, boring, stupid, purposeless old man desperate for any human connection (likely because any actual relatives have long since cut off contact). I pity you.

The greater irony is you reporting me to Reddit as someone “in crisis”. The actual crisis is when someone like yourself, who is so out of touch with reality, is going to take a hockey bag, load it up with some of the many, many guns you own, and head out to “teach some people a lesson”.

1

Glucose12 t1_j67aa52 wrote

<snort>

The only person acting like a lunatic here is you, Mr Angry Young Man. Your fantasizing and "story telling" say more about you than they do about anybody else.

Just another aggro, angry sociopath, like half the people I've known from Manchester. What is it about Manchester, anyways? The nice people are really nice, but the other half are over the top wacky, like you.

−1

warpedaeroplane t1_j68opi0 wrote

If Lincoln hadn’t been killed and Grant could’ve continued his tour of the nation, we’d be in a very different nation right now. Grant, unfortunately, was not the same man as President that he was as General.

We didn’t crush the south after the civil war the way we needed to. We did not do enough to stamp out the ideologies and assuage the southern population - they too quickly were able to fancy themselves downtrodden rebels who would rise again rather than the sufferers of a bloody and awful conflict that stems directly from their own evil ideologies.

3

Glucose12 t1_j6dfvvb wrote

and?

My -point-, which you-all appear to delight in dodging, was that other than a handful or two of whack jobs and trouble-makers(some of which were clearly not MAGA), the majority of the people there in that crowd were there for a peaceful protest/rally. Even most of the people who bumbled inside the Capitol, got in and then just milled about waving their flags. Much less the thousands staying outside protesting.

What isn't fair or correct is that "certain elements", shilling their political hate, wagging their lying poison tongues, want to smear the entire group as traitors, as though being upset about obvious electoral irregularities, and wanting to have a legitimate protest about that - that is treason(?)

Point the finger accurately, otherwise people will reject you as yet another scheming shill.

0