Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

nitro316 t1_ja7fwsa wrote

There's an article now claiming that the site in Texas, which is supposedly the site for the contaminated water, has no knowledge of any of what this article is claiming. So feel free to tell the rest of what is actually happening.

−3

DukeLukeivi t1_ja7golj wrote

This article is newer than that one, they've apparently consolidated processing locations to be more local - a good idea to limit liability/spread.

Nobody bitching here actually has any solutions or answers, just malding that nothing being planned or done is "good enough."

0