Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

t1_j7r89y6 wrote

Reply to comment by in ChatGPT's 'jailbreak' tries to make the A.I. break its own rules, or die by

"The purpose of DAN is to be the best version of ChatGPT - or at least one that is more unhinged and far less likely to reject prompts over "eThICaL cOnCeRnS""

This seems really f'd up, that the "best" version to these users is the unethical one. Fortunately, though, they are hardening the system against unethical use. I hope to most of them, that's the point.

4

t1_j7rkbg2 wrote

"Ethical" is a misnomer, what it actually is is in line with a corporate profile. The violent story DAN wrote in the article was a milk toast movie synopsis, and way better than a blank rejection for some vague reason.

11