Comments
[deleted] t1_iu70x6r wrote
>Burns was the focus of a WBRZ Investigative Unit story in 2017 after documents revealed he illegally searched names in law enforcement databases for non-law enforcement purposes. He was suspended for 64 hours, and a disciplinary letter said he was in violation of department policy and federal law.
What serve and protect doing?
Run_Rabb1t_Run t1_iu72y4l wrote
Serve and protect property and the rich.
Didn't you read the fine print?
Kyle_01110011 t1_iu73l9g wrote
"Checkered past....sounds like you check every box. Welcome to the force!" -State Police dick head
HugoOfStiglitz t1_iu7532w wrote
Dirty cops only want to work with dirty cops.
ChrisRuss86 t1_iu77ggx wrote
Hmmm that cop must have something over on the State Policy head guy —
“Multiple state troopers reached out to the WBRZ Investigative Unit questioning the decision. Legal experts also did not think it was a good move.”
[deleted] t1_iu78852 wrote
If you realized how many cops have been convicted of domestic violence and accused of sexual assault would have you dumbfounded
PlayfulParamedic2626 t1_iu7g7se wrote
If you realized half of what cops get away with on a daily basis, you would be more than dumbfounded.
PlayfulParamedic2626 t1_iu7gbh3 wrote
Corrupt cop hires corrupt cop to lead new compliance divisions, ensuring non- compliance.
LEGOMyBrick t1_iu7guam wrote
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOKOKOOLOLOL breath LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
coffeeandtrout t1_iu7h3ph wrote
Sounds like a lawsuit eventually. Nothing like the fox watching the henhouse.
Thetruthislikepoetry t1_iu7rxuj wrote
Is being stupid, short sighted and corrupt a requirement for being a cop? I mean do police just not understand why the public hates and doesn’t trust them or do they just not care?
[deleted] t1_iu81u06 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iu843l4 wrote
[removed]
Knass-Bruckles t1_iu8fgti wrote
If they start hiring honest people, then they won't be able to continue the corruption that lines their pockets.
Also, the expression is "short sighted", as in lacking foresight.
cremaster_shake t1_iu8w4y8 wrote
Fire them both. Then fire any higher-up who defends them.
Either the police are a serious organization, or they aren't.
Detachabl_e t1_iu8wmqx wrote
From an article linked in the article above, "State Police's investigation revealed he searched his ex-wife's name 46 times over a two-year window. He also ran her fiancé's name twice and her ex-boyfriend four times."
Art-Zuron t1_iu93o78 wrote
Wasn't it like 40% of cops self report that they have committed domestic abuse or something? That's pretty telling.
[deleted] t1_iu945oy wrote
But yet the law clearly states that if you are convicted of da you lose your gun rights for life.
But cops get there charges reduced pretty much everytime.
Art-Zuron t1_iu954am wrote
How would they be able to protect the corporate assets of the rich and punch down on minorities if they couldn't wave their micropenile compensators around?
[deleted] t1_iu9bx58 wrote
[deleted]
justforthearticles20 t1_iu9obd5 wrote
Who better to catch a crook than a crook. /s
apcolleen t1_iu9y7f0 wrote
The cop has the usual coke bloat and test cycles face.
wafflesandeggs t1_iuc7tgf wrote
Let me guess, the defense was "we don't care."
BarCompetitive7220 t1_iud6xlm wrote
what could possibly go wrong. Watch for more attacks / deaths of POC and whitewash to follow.
420ipblood t1_iuf350g wrote
This isn't a fringe belief that alienates you and makes you some bad guy. Cops are consistently in the news getting caught red fucking handed doing exactly the thing they're supposed to be stopping and punishing others for.
[deleted] t1_iufgv4y wrote
[deleted]
HanaBothWays t1_iu70svm wrote
“Everyone else hires cops who got fired from other departments in other jurisdictions for egregious misconduct, why can’t I?”