“Everyone else hires cops who got fired from other departments in other jurisdictions for egregious misconduct, why can’t I?”

>Burns was the focus of a WBRZ Investigative Unit story in 2017 after documents revealed he illegally searched names in law enforcement databases for non-law enforcement purposes. He was suspended for 64 hours, and a disciplinary letter said he was in violation of department policy and federal law.

What serve and protect doing?

Ya gotta have someone in da know Dat knows ya gotta break da rule, lawz iz fur other little people.

[removed]

Serve and protect property and the rich.

Didn't you read the fine print?

"Checkered past....sounds like you check every box. Welcome to the force!" -State Police dick head

[deleted]

Dirty cops only want to work with dirty cops.

Hmmm that cop must have something over on the State Policy head guy —

“Multiple state troopers reached out to the WBRZ Investigative Unit questioning the decision. Legal experts also did not think it was a good move.”

[removed]

If you realized how many cops have been convicted of domestic violence and accused of sexual assault would have you dumbfounded

seems oddly familiar

This guy will be more effective in sniffing out people out of compliance since he broke all the rules?

If you realized half of what cops get away with on a daily basis, you would be more than dumbfounded.

Corrupt cop hires corrupt cop to lead new compliance divisions, ensuring non- compliance.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOKOKOOLOLOL breath LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Sounds like a lawsuit eventually. Nothing like the fox watching the henhouse.

Is being stupid, short sighted and corrupt a requirement for being a cop? I mean do police just not understand why the public hates and doesn’t trust them or do they just not care?

Sounds like they need a new compliance office AND a new head of the state police

[removed]

[removed]

[removed]

If they start hiring honest people, then they won't be able to continue the corruption that lines their pockets.

Also, the expression is "short sighted", as in lacking foresight.

Fire them both. Then fire any higher-up who defends them.

Either the police are a serious organization, or they aren't.

From an article linked in the article above, "State Police's investigation revealed he searched his ex-wife's name 46 times over a two-year window. He also ran her fiancé's name twice and her ex-boyfriend four times."

[removed]

Seems a perfect fit to the old adage "the fox guarding the hen house".

Wasn't it like 40% of cops self report that they have committed domestic abuse or something? That's pretty telling.

But yet the law clearly states that if you are convicted of da you lose your gun rights for life.

But cops get there charges reduced pretty much everytime.

How would they be able to protect the corporate assets of the rich and punch down on minorities if they couldn't wave their micropenile compensators around?

[deleted]

So why don't we hire convicts to be police let's just pull the curtain back for crying out loud.

Who better to catch a crook than a crook. /s

The cop has the usual coke bloat and test cycles face.

Let me guess, the defense was "we don't care."

[removed]

what could possibly go wrong. Watch for more attacks / deaths of POC and whitewash to follow.

This isn't a fringe belief that alienates you and makes you some bad guy. Cops are consistently in the news getting caught red fucking handed doing exactly the thing they're supposed to be stopping and punishing others for.

[deleted]