earhere t1_j0crp0u wrote
Reply to comment by Schrecht in D.C. Bar panel tentatively finds Giuliani likely committed ethics violation with false election claims by Pomp_N_Circumstance
In this case, they're using the vague wishy-washy language because the panel hasn't made a final decision yet; but they want to get a news article out without sounding concrete and final.
Schrecht t1_j0cw237 wrote
Honestly, I do understand that. But when we've all seen and heard him, and when he put so much into the public record with spurious, evidence-free filings, it looks like a slam dunk from here.
T-Bills t1_j0cyfxf wrote
It's the year 2077. Rudy has been dead for decades. A panel will finally unanimously agree after a 7-year deliberation with hundreds of witnesses and 2 million pages of testimony that it's highly probable that Rudy committed some ethically unsavory actions.
The panel has also voted in a bitterly divided fashion that further investigation by a new panel is warranted.
[deleted] t1_j0cwnsd wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j0d7999 wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments