Submitted by BusbyBusby t3_zhprvk in news
Comments
starrpamph t1_iznbti6 wrote
Damn it's like a war zone over there
yowzas648 t1_iznefeh wrote
Thank you! That headline was ultra confusing.
DickwadVonClownstick t1_iznfm0u wrote
Gee, it's almost like Ukraine is a warzone due to being invaded by a country with a long history of killing journalists and a vested interest in preventing people from reporting the numerous war crimes they are currently committing.
lukeworldwalker t1_iznh1c3 wrote
Yeah I would say that because Russia claims that all of Ukrainian territory belongs to Russia, and Russia started an unjustified invasion, those statistics should say journalists were killed in Russia. Or at least by Russia.
Just to be clear, I of course do not support Russia’s claims. Just trying to show how ridiculous Russian logic is.
Showerthawts t1_iznmagr wrote
No. Russia is deadly TO journalists.
DrYoda t1_iznqv9c wrote
Just to clarify your clarification, 12 journalists died in Ukraine, some from different countries. Not 67 Ukrainian journalists dead worldwide.
DocHolidayiN t1_iznrpyc wrote
I think it's more of a time ansd place issue. The frontlines really aren't a place for non combatants.
Nullion1945 t1_iznw10b wrote
And who exactly is this ‘worldwide’ fellow they’re supposed to have killed?
I certainly hope pitbull is okay
[deleted] t1_iznw46s wrote
[deleted]
ChallyPrime t1_iznzh1d wrote
You guys just want war crimes to go unseen? Or government propaganda to be the only word on events?
BigHardThunderRock t1_izo3wtk wrote
Should be more "the front lines really aren't a place if the goal is to avoid dying."
JanitorKarl t1_izo7rbj wrote
It's been a rough year for journalists. My regards to them.
[deleted] t1_izo82vs wrote
[removed]
scawtsauce t1_izo83yh wrote
now it's a ghost town.
somewhatfriendlyuser t1_izocljq wrote
War coverage in Ukraine is deadliest for journalists...
FIFY
Mountain-Ad-244 t1_izojpzj wrote
1 per month Doesn’t seem to bad. Considering its a literal fucking war.
oldgeek123 t1_izoy5mp wrote
I don't see why it wouldn't be.
sterlingarcher1400 t1_izp2jhc wrote
1 in any given time is too many
Mountain-Ad-244 t1_izp3v48 wrote
Its a literal war. I am more concerned with the thousands of Ukrainians getting killed and maimed. Not the 1 journalist going to the front. Theres enough drone footage and capability of speaking via internet, no need to waste resources getting someone with little benefit to a war zone.
[deleted] t1_izplt03 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_izpmztw wrote
[removed]
blondechinesehair t1_izq8n1b wrote
People with degrees get paid to write these headlines
Jump_and_Drop t1_izqne3f wrote
It's like they want you to attribute that 67 number to Ukraine.
[deleted] t1_izqveos wrote
[removed]
Operational117 t1_izr5sph wrote
Just rubbles… for miles on end…
[deleted] t1_izvouif wrote
raizhassan t1_izw7572 wrote
The more the soldiers hate journalists in a warzone the more they are needed. Anyone who thinks differnetly needs their head checked.
BoyTitan t1_izwt30q wrote
Yes none combatants causing combatants to risk their life to save their dumb ass is really needed. Absolutely not. War crimes happen, protocol gets broke. You don't need some bloke with a camera in the way.
NateShaw92 t1_izx479n wrote
Wouldn't even be that unrealistic with a war going on.
NateShaw92 t1_izx4au2 wrote
And were not among the 67.
blondechinesehair t1_izxc64z wrote
Can’t be KIA from their studio apartment
DocHolidayiN t1_izzqpgp wrote
I don't want them there because I would feel responsible for them and it could get me killed.
capricabuffy t1_iznagsl wrote
Eeeeeep.... as a black sea journalist... Imma book a flight to Australia....