Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Archmage_of_Detroit t1_j229x5k wrote

Reply to comment by dyxlesic_fa in Colorado will launch its new Missing Indigenous Person Alert program on Friday by AudibleNod

We ARE correcting the issue. For years, Native women have gone missing and nobody gave a shit.

That was one of the main criticisms I heard online about the Gabbi Petito case - like yeah, we should be solving missing person cases, but where was this level of attention and outrage over the thousands of black and indigenous women who have gone missing in the US and Canada over the past few decades?

7

dyxlesic_fa t1_j22ckjh wrote

Correcting the issue one race at a time, then.

3

thatoddtetrapod t1_j23pcp5 wrote

The issue is PL-280. Authorities can’t even investigate indigenous women’s disappearances at all unless they know the race of the perpetrator who killed her. This is because indigenous on indigenous crimes must be investigated by tribal police whereas non-tribal member on indigenous crimes are investigated by either the FBI or state police. Problem is, with disappearing women, you often won’t know who the perpetrator is without an investigation. It’s a horrible situation where indigenous women simply don’t get looked for by investigators. It’s fundamentally not the same as for any other race. You should really do a lick of research before forming opinions like these in the future. this video is a good start. I’ve timestamped to the part that explains PL-280.

10

chuiy t1_j26cgfs wrote

Do you have the attention for that? Are you yourself going to care about a new case every day and advicate for it? No? Exactly.

People shouldn't be made to feel less than for trying to find Gabbi Petitio. Sometimes, some things just catch on and people do what they can (even if just to fit in).

That said, it feels unfair, in spite of past shortcomings, to divert resources and attention away from other cases and on to one subgroup. It's nothing more than a bad apology. Because the police aren't expanding resources... so it's a trade, not "extra" anything. Some lives instead of some other lives, written in ink.

They didn't hire more police. People don't suddenly have a larger attention span.

−1

Grouchy_Occasion2292 t1_j26ngup wrote

I don't think you a fundamentally understand the problem literally at all. These cases are often not investigated at all. It has nothing to do with lack of resources or the attention span of your average American.

1

chuiy t1_j26ob7o wrote

I don't discount the problems that have been brought to light regarding the lack of attention, resources, or follow through for minority, sex workers, and indigenous people especially.

That said, the alert system should remain objective and apolitical. It should place survivability, risk of harm, etc. above all else, not skin color. I'm not saying this to sound contrarian, I firmly believe two wrongs don't make a right.

I understand the intention, but resources are shared. They're tangible objects and finite, ever passing, windows of time. Maybe it won't be an issue. Maybe this is feel good legislation. Maybe it doesn't divert resources and it's been given consideration--who knows. That's just my opinion.

If we treated all cases and alerts equally, minority women should still be given the appropriate attention if we reform the rest correctly. Hold people accountable for negligence regarding cases, hold jurisdictions with disproportionate rates accountable (somehow), etc. That would be my solution.

1