KamikazeArchon t1_ja6dpdu wrote
Reply to comment by HaikuKnives in Twitter argues before Supreme Court that letting ISIS use platform not the same as aiding and abetting terror by do-you-know-the-way9
ISIS is not just a group that has "speech that others object to", and claiming it's an issue of just "speech that others object to" is disingenuous.
Yes, there's a difficult grey area somewhere between "common carrier" (the phone company isn't liable if you happen to talk about terrorism over the phone) and "active participant" (someone starting a newspaper specifically and solely to publish ISIS messages). The difficulties are not what you're presenting.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments