Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

SisyphusPolitico t1_j9usgdl wrote

Wait, so other men arent banned?

That would make toilets coed.

If the toilets are coed, then there are no womens toilets.

So hes not banned.

But if he not banned, then the general accepted ban on men in womens toilets applies.

Womens toilets exist!

But then his ban applies.

So other men...arent banned?

−2

mrtn17 t1_j9uw2xc wrote

what is this, a haiku?

4

SisyphusPolitico t1_j9uxzz8 wrote

Clearly not.

An amusing script Playing with absurd reason Martin failed english

2

Khemith t1_j9wxnhl wrote

Just say you're a transphobe and be done with it. Just say you're sexuality is fragile that you cannot look at another set of genitals.

It must make your day when you can couch your bigotry in a crime story.

Side question: Why do reactionaries have ancient names? Does it make you feel smartz? Make you feel like you're a independent who sees the "truth" ?

0

SisyphusPolitico t1_j9zzebl wrote

Lol you moron. Its a logic loop. Project much?

Theres no fucking trans even in this - a cis man was perving on women in cis gendered bathrooms. This, as other commentators noted, is a fucking proof of point that anti trans sentiment is stupid.

You personally tho can go take whatever genitals you have and apply them directly to yourself.

1