Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

MrTomDawson t1_j9t2a4e wrote

Maybe I've misunderstood, but my understanding has always been that as a man I'm already banned from the women's toilets?

228

VyrPlan t1_j9t2q4z wrote

>"He was convicted...of voyeurism and that offence was for him hiding in a toilet and taking photographs of a female in cubicle next door.

so that was the first time, and then later after being found in another women's restroom

>Chasing officers caught him and seized his mobile phone on which almost 400 upskirt-style photographs were discovered.

welp, seems like a ban from further visits to the ladies room is only appropriate

269

cb43569 t1_j9t49jz wrote

There are no laws in the UK governing which bathroom you can use. The fact that women use the women's bathroom and men use the men's bathroom is a matter of social convention. It's a bit like how there's no law saying you can't skip a queue, but you would be shamed by the people around you if you did. (In the US in recent years, right-wing Republicans have been introducing "bathroom bills" enforcing this division, but in the service of transphobia by excluding trans women from women's bathrooms.)

In this case, a court has made an order banning this guy from women's bathrooms, meaning that he will in fact be guilty of a criminal offence if he goes into one.

121

xu235 t1_j9t4d62 wrote

400 women? Why is he not in jail for decades??

20

CaveatRumptor t1_j9t4tiu wrote

Some people believe this sort of brazen opportunism is an admirable quality. I do not, but am just pointing out that people often get moral support for this sort of thing.

−40

balazs955 t1_j9t5z9s wrote

Who put his face in the toilets?

10

aagjevraagje t1_j9t65a4 wrote

In a lot of places gendered bathrooms are not in fact legally enforced.

Men who need to use a changing station or borrow a toilet roll or have to deal with maintenance being done on the mens toilet or whatever other non creepy reason one might use the bathroom of another gender for have not crossed any legal boundary.

It’s harrasing people and voyourism that’s not allowed.

That’s how it works in much of the world.

86

jamcdonald120 t1_j9tbhd9 wrote

Me: The problem with letting transgenderel people use any bathroom is that perverts will abuse it to sneak into other restrooms to peep

Everyone: NO ONE WOULD EVER DO THAT!!! WHY ARE YOU TRANSPHOBIC!!! THATS CLEARLY NOT A PROBLEM!!!

Me: riiiiiiight, keep telling your self that.

−69

hypatiatextprotocol t1_j9tdt6k wrote

Are you kidding? He wasn't trans, and he wasn't dressed like a woman. He wasn't "encouraged" by knowing that trans people use bathrooms. He was a prolific voyeur who kept going into women's bathrooms despite being caught and arrested several times.

Men voyeuring in public bathrooms and taking upskirt photos is not new. Maybe the blame could lie with men?

33

Benedictus84 t1_j9tf15h wrote

The argument is more that there is nothing stopping perverts right now. As is shown by this outstanding individual.

There is no reason to change your gender to do the things perverts do.

And trans people do not get a free pass to do pervert things in the bathroom of the preference. This would also be illegal for a trans person to do.

So trans people doing perverted stuff is indeed not a problem. Atleast not any more or less then non trans people doing it.

40

imafraidofmuricans t1_j9tfdt9 wrote

But..

What?

Do you think there are fucking force fields stopping people who present as male from entering bathrooms?

This post is literally that.

A cis man, entirely without pretending to be or being transgender, went into women's bathroom. How are you fucking solving that you fucking moron?

33

nylockian t1_j9thwib wrote

Aren't all men banned from women's toilets in the UK?

Maybe it's different over there.

6

bouchert t1_j9ti2gu wrote

At first, the headline confused me. Like, "His face was banned? So, what, was he posting his photographic headshots on the insides of the stalls and scaring women?"

3

bulgarianlily t1_j9tilob wrote

Lauren Fisher, mitigating, said her client had pleaded guilty to breaching a sexual harm prevention order at the earliest opportunity. She said he had completed all of the unpaid work, treatment programmes and probation service requirements from his last sentence.

So sadly none of that worked. Guess you can only change people's obsessions if they want to change.

8

lemlurker t1_j9tj4ym wrote

No there's no legal protection for entering a women's toilet or even for women entering the men's. It's about what you do and what you intend. If you just go in, use the cubicle and leave without any intent to cause harm or distress you have commited no offense

18

cr0ft t1_j9tkuwe wrote

Putting a sign on the door that says "Women" doesn't have any actual laws and regs behind it.

In fact, I always try to use women's restrooms myself if they're single occupancy obviously... I don't go into big ones with stalls. Why single occupancy ones, though? Because the chances that there will be piss on the ceiling, walls, seat and floor go down slightly vs men's public restrooms, where all that is guaranteed.

In this case, the issue is that the guy is a voyeuristic perv lowlife and thus banned from being exactly that.

5

yukon-flower t1_j9tl2o9 wrote

I was so confused by the headline as well. Like he’s just a normal looking person, so why are people hanging up pictures of his face in the stalls? (Especially when I’d never really seen ANYONE’s face displayed in the ladies’ room). And who is going to police this new rule?

30

cr0ft t1_j9tlcyv wrote

Yeah, the crime here is voyeurism, not using the toilet.

If I needed to go explosively and the men's was occupied, better believe I'd barge into a stall in the women's.

15

Vault-Born t1_j9tuqha wrote

The fact that this person is a cis man and made no attempts to hide their gender in any way and yet had unfiltered access to bathrooms anyyway, kind of proves the point that it would be pointless to in transition to gain access to a woman's bathroom to begin with huh? Like the fact that this is a court case kind of undercuts the entire transphobic theory of bathroom perverts right? Because if you need to transition to get into a bathroom and yet this guy didn't transition and was successfully repeatedly able to enter bathrooms for years.... Seems like all the transition would have done is put him on an increased risk of violence and scrutiny. From a statistical perspective, that's just fact.

26

ShrekJohnson27 t1_j9tzcfh wrote

Oh cmon officers he said he identified as a woman

−38

Skogula t1_j9u1gaf wrote

So, the rest of him his OK, just not his face?

2

StarksFTW t1_j9u1toz wrote

This isn’t the Middle Ages. Voyeurism isn’t rape, it’s gross and fucked up but they’re not gonna run around and cut peoples hands off for it. Privacy was violated but no physical harm, or contact, was done.

2

ShrekJohnson27 t1_j9u38lk wrote

It’s funny. Ofc this guy had nothing to do with that and was basically a peeping tom taking photos. Maybe the UK shouldn’t be letting different genders use the same bathroom freely

−37

ShrekJohnson27 t1_j9u7889 wrote

What are you talking about? I have trans friends you bozo. And I only edited bc I accidentally posted it before finishing my sentence. You’re seriously sad and screaming bitter about your life through the screen

−1

TocTheElder t1_j9ud4ku wrote

How are trans people responsible for the actions of this cis man? How would forcing trans people to use a bathroom that is not befitting to them stop this man from just walking into another women's bathroom tomorrow?

6

theRose90 t1_j9ue8k4 wrote

I mean I don't imagine they'd ban you from like "Just women's toilets in London" or something if they felt they needed to ban you from women's toilets at all.

2

RefanRes t1_j9ufkfj wrote

This title belongs in r/titlegore

0

StarksFTW t1_j9ul89a wrote

And he got a month in prison and several years of parole. The guy is clearly mentally ill and needs professional help. Locking him away for decades would help no one and would only worsen his mental state when he would be released. That sort of punitive punishment is not helpful and is demonstrably harmful to society.

10

SetterOfTrends t1_j9um7h0 wrote

But did they take his picture in the women’s’ stalls?

1

goliathfasa t1_j9up7tw wrote

Aren’t men already banned from women’s toilets by default?

0

ShrekJohnson27 t1_j9upv0m wrote

Haha you’re hilarious, sad how much you wish I was lying. I’d easily offer proof but you seem bitter and weird and like you’d stalk me online so I’m good staying private. Her name is Nicole, used to be Nick. Also it’s so weird how insistent you are that I’m lying, why are you in denial so hard it’s weird 😂

−2

SisyphusPolitico t1_j9usgdl wrote

Wait, so other men arent banned?

That would make toilets coed.

If the toilets are coed, then there are no womens toilets.

So hes not banned.

But if he not banned, then the general accepted ban on men in womens toilets applies.

Womens toilets exist!

But then his ban applies.

So other men...arent banned?

−2

ShrekJohnson27 t1_j9v00kz wrote

You’re the one asking for proof so I’m providing some background. Nicole and I are mad chill, stay hating. You think bc you spend all day on Reddit with a lot of karma what you say matters?? How many trans people are you close friends with

0

ShrekJohnson27 t1_j9v2j9g wrote

Stay mad, you’re so damn pissed about Nicole. Nick, went by Nicholas, went to middle school with her, high school too. In the PNW, don’t want to get any more specific bc you’re a weirdo but by all means believe whatever you want to believe, I’m simply not lying

−1

Darzok t1_j9v6ol8 wrote

Its in fact protected under UK law that you can not stop men or women using the toilets of the other gender due to gender discrimination laws. There is no way to enforce this with out breaking the law with out a court order banning said person.

3

SirThatsCuba t1_j9vkyuw wrote

When I was a kid I remember it very common to find women in the men's rooms. Now I either tend to just go to less popular attractions or they've figured out how to provide women with enough toilets. Not sure which I never wanted to be a civil engineer.

4

Khemith t1_j9wxnhl wrote

Just say you're a transphobe and be done with it. Just say you're sexuality is fragile that you cannot look at another set of genitals.

It must make your day when you can couch your bigotry in a crime story.

Side question: Why do reactionaries have ancient names? Does it make you feel smartz? Make you feel like you're a independent who sees the "truth" ?

0

Uncynical_Diogenes t1_j9x5puu wrote

I understand that.

I don’t understand peeping your phone camera under stalls when the internet has so much quality filth easily available.

Some part of this fucker enjoyed having power, of doing it without their consent, and that’s never okay.

10

The_Real_IT_Guy t1_j9z1abi wrote

So men aren't already banned from entering the ladies room in the UK?

1

ShrekJohnson27 t1_j9z78p2 wrote

Dude she literally is, how come a trans person has to behave exactly a particular way or else you don’t think they exist, but transphobic. Also clearly not about the karma if you online chronically enough to rack that much up 😂 she literally is though you fucking moron, I could tag the insta if you want

0

ViscountessKeller t1_j9za3o9 wrote

You go right ahead, buddy. I can't wait. I look forward to meeting this ghost.

Wasn't she already watching and laughing at this thread, or did you forget you already said that? I assume if she was actually interested she'd have posted already. You know, if she actually existed.

1

ViscountessKeller t1_j9zw7p7 wrote

Yeah, you linked some random woman's instagram. Good job.

You're not very good at this whole 'lying' thing, are you? And why the hell would you give your friend's private account to a complete rando?

I mean, obviously because this woman isn't actually your friend, although she -might- be your stalking victim.

1

SisyphusPolitico t1_j9zzebl wrote

Lol you moron. Its a logic loop. Project much?

Theres no fucking trans even in this - a cis man was perving on women in cis gendered bathrooms. This, as other commentators noted, is a fucking proof of point that anti trans sentiment is stupid.

You personally tho can go take whatever genitals you have and apply them directly to yourself.

1

ShrekJohnson27 t1_ja0ax4k wrote

That’s literally my friend you bozo! 😂 I don’t know how to make it any clearer without giving away my identity to a weirdo obsessed with saying I’m lying and I do NOT want to open that can of worms 💀 went to school with her my whole life, Liberty Middle School you flaming idiot. Also wdym why would I give you the insta???? You asked for proof 800 times like a repetitive robot that can’t say anything else

1

RedBottom123 t1_ja0ny14 wrote

How tf are they gonna enforce that tbh. I’m just curious bc like what’s stopping him from doing this again, I doubt cops are going and checking the bathrooms for this man

1

KesonaFyren t1_ja6sqn0 wrote

It's definitely hard to prove when rape kits are so frequently not given or sit untested afterwards.

It's even harder to prove when it's such an underrepoted crime because victims fear they won't be believed, and would rather try to move on then go through the additional stress of trying to get justice.

The tounge-in-cheek point of my comment was that sex crimes aren't taken as seriously as they should be.

1