Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Edwunclerthe3rd t1_j7kkusq wrote

Reply to comment by youcantfindoutwhoiam in MTA spent twice as much on Second Ave subway consultants as it did on its construction by NYY657545

Well if we're going there Paris doesn't have buildings taller than the Eiffel tower, so they cap at like 750ft

1

lickedTators t1_j7knja7 wrote

How much affordable housing does the Eiffel tower provide? If a minimum age worker can't afford a 1-bedroom in the tower then I don't think it should be built. Let's turn the space into a depot for horses.

5

youcantfindoutwhoiam t1_j7kp8ss wrote

Try to tell that to the La défense neighborhood...

5

wutcnbrowndo4u t1_j7l2qpz wrote

Pedantic, but La Defense isn't a neighborhood of Paris. It's outside the city of Paris.

3

youcantfindoutwhoiam t1_j7l8y0o wrote

"Paris" includes the suburbs for most people though. It's like saying Brooklyn is not NY city 😂 And La défense has one of the major subway, RER, Transilien hub underground.

2

CactusBoyScout t1_j7kqkb6 wrote

That’s just in the old parts of Paris. They put all the skyscrapers in a designated business district called La Defense.

2

Edwunclerthe3rd t1_j7kwqj1 wrote

Of which the tallest building is tour first at 738 feet

1

down_up__left_right t1_j7l5m27 wrote

What does this matter when we generally build subways under streets not skyscrapers?

If we were building a new line under WTC 1 then the height of it could be relevant.

1

Creative_username969 t1_j7n3spn wrote

My guess would be lateral/shear forces. Tall buildings are subject to a great deal of wind-related shear forces. If those forces lead to outward force being applied to sides of the foundation, then the ability of the ground surrounding the sides of the foundation to resist those forces matters.

1