Metapod_Used_Hardon t1_jdj3vqd wrote
Reply to comment by JeffeBezos in NYC tenants report rampant housing discrimination by landlords over vouchers by DrogDrill
> they're very well within their legal rights to opt with the other applicant.
Of course they are. I’m not sure why you’re repeating yourself when I already agreed with you. Not discriminating against vouchers does not mean favoring vouchers. I never claimed that and I already told you that.
What I have said is that the voucher status isn’t supposed to be part of the decision at all. If a landlord consistently ends up accepting non-vouchered applicants over vouchered ones, though, it would be hard to come up with an explanation that doesn’t rely on the voucher factoring in to the decision.
JeffeBezos t1_jdj405o wrote
I have no idea while I'm still engaging with you.
Take care!
[deleted] t1_jdj4j66 wrote
[deleted]
JeffeBezos t1_jdj4yt5 wrote
>Arrogance
Take a look in the mirror, pal.
Metapod_Used_Hardon t1_jdj5p51 wrote
Looking good, buddy.
mehkindaok t1_jdn3hv3 wrote
Make 40x the monthly rent, have 750+ credit score and stellar prior landlord references? Voucher or not, come right over! Have 400 credit score and a bunch of prior eviction? Go pound sand, no soup apartment for you - irresponsible deadbeats are not a protected class! That's how it works in the real world bucko.
Metapod_Used_Hardon t1_jdnsp89 wrote
Neat story, gramps.
[deleted] t1_jdnsk0p wrote
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments