notqualitystreet t1_jbod1op wrote
And large sections of tunnel have already been built- wtf is up with these costs
b1argg t1_jbouvq3 wrote
Interest rates are way up. The MTA needs to fund construction with bonds, which are now much more expensive.
OnceOnThisIsland t1_jbozrh3 wrote
Not to mention inflation is causing issues with infrastructure costs across the country.
b1argg t1_jbp0tfg wrote
> Not to mention inflation is causing issues with infrastructure costs across the country.
eldersveld t1_jbprbya wrote
Taco Bell brought back the Bacon Club Chalupa and it's over $6 for just one of them lol
sumgye t1_jbqodk2 wrote
The subway situation is easily solvable. We just need to start putting the subway under streets again instead of miles underground. Yes we will need to dig up an avenue, but it will take less than a year of closures and it's not like there are a lack of streets for cars to use as alternatives.
djdjddhdhdh t1_jbqzvus wrote
It’s not the closures as much as all the other shit that’s underground
woodcider t1_jbr83u0 wrote
And there are probably more underground utilities than there were in “cut and cover” days. There’d be no cost savings with the addition of massive road closures that are also a financial drain.
gobeklitepewasamall t1_jbrru4h wrote
The issue is all the unknown unknowns under ground. Nyc is a maze of underground infrastructure, much of it ancient, orphaned tunnels and wire and pipe, and whose builders aren’t even around anymore. There isn’t even a unified map, they’re just starting to collate and digitize what fragments they have, but, this being ny, it’s a slow, tedious process full of red tape, inter factional dick measuring, government incompetence and refusal to talk to anyone in another office of the same department, let alone outside agencies or industry.
I’ve been saying for years that we need a single, central, searchable database for everything under our feet here. Something we can collate into a 3d cad map.
gonzo5622 t1_jbpjaeb wrote
But these types of shenanigans have happened over decades. Other countries are able to build high functioning rail at fractions of the cost and time. If you’ve been to China or Japan, you’ll know how a country can build things quickly and efficiently.
b1argg t1_jbq1g5i wrote
I was recently in Singapore and the MRT made me want to cry.
gonzo5622 t1_jbq7l8x wrote
It’s nuts. And these places need to create the tunnels to begin with. We’re just asking to retrofit them so they’re modern. Kinda insane
Makeyoownmoney t1_jbrujda wrote
Was to see the F1 or Davie504?
planning_throwaway1 t1_jbxybxf wrote
And the MRT has only been around since like 1990
planning_throwaway1 t1_jbxyatk wrote
Or Paris or Spain or Korea or Taiwan...
[deleted] t1_jbqkhua wrote
[deleted]
gonzo5622 t1_jbql43f wrote
Yep, and that’s my point, our system is just so stupid. It took 5 years of squabbling to get the WTC rebuilt. That’s a stupid long time to rebuild something that became a symbol for us, and it was all of because of “authority”. These other nations are much more efficient and will move obstacles to enable progress (at least when it comes to infrastructure).
[deleted] t1_jbqm5uj wrote
[deleted]
dspeyer t1_jbp2tij wrote
I don't think that's included in this number. We'll know how much that cost when we learn how long it takes to pay off the bonds.
Pool_Shark t1_jbp5ys2 wrote
Using inflation as an excuse to increase the amount being funneled into their cousins bank account
Exit-Velocity t1_jbp71xe wrote
Crony theft
Topher1999 t1_jbpe9bh wrote
They’re going to make the stations huge like GCM. They don’t need to be huge.
Insomniac_80 t1_jbs7kx1 wrote
And so far underground that it takes too much time to get out of them!
Grass8989 OP t1_jbost34 wrote
Yup, could you imagine the costs if they were digging all of these tunnels fresh?
PersonalFan480 t1_jbvazv1 wrote
https://transitcosts.com/wp-content/uploads/NewYork_Case_Study.pdf
Sums up as incompetence at every level of the MTA. The MTA does not have the engineering staff to build its own subways, nor to design their own subways, nor to supervise the contractors who would do the above. For that matter, they cannot handle even simple capital projects at a reasonable cost.
And the leadership, who are mostly political hacks and career managers who haven't had an original thought in decades all drive and so do not use their own product. They also do not care nor want to learn about best practices for subway operations. Meanwhile the MTA, instead of developing in house capacity to handle capital projects, has created a stupidly complex rule book that inflates costs because for-profit contractors aren't just going to eat the extra costs of compliance.
planning_throwaway1 t1_jbxyrsb wrote
Yeah. Most places keep costs down by having more internal staff. We've largely gutted public staffing across the board, NYC's planning staff is a fraction of what it used to be.
Everyone is run ragged, so everything gets outsourced to contractors at 3x the cost.
Paris builds new rail constantly, at a fraction of NYC prices, despite being an old system, in an old city, with a river and riddled with catacombs below ground, with a heavily unionized workforce.
The big "trick" is they do it all in-house, only outsource if absolutely necessary, and keep contractors on a tight leash. Also, they don't have to do multi-year long environmental reviews and feasibility studies for every little project, they just do them.
hjablowme919 t1_jbshyg7 wrote
Unions.
[deleted] t1_jbopotr wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments