Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

jonishay8 t1_ir05zpn wrote

Probably makes the most sense of you’re not trying to piss off any locals.

38

HEIMDVLLR t1_ir064jx wrote

They might as well placed them on Riker’s Island.

Edit: Randall’s island has a psych ward, homeless shelters and where a lot of sex offenders are allowed to live.

−21

k1lk1 t1_ir066wx wrote

Public transit on Randall's Island sucks, but it might actually be better than near Orchard Beach...

63

ThreeLittlePuigs t1_ir0e6zo wrote

So does my neighborhood and likely the one in the Bronx where they were building the encampment in the first place. There’s plenty of reasons to criticize the move without throwing the homeless under the bus as some awful population to be nearby

12

HEIMDVLLR t1_ir0gapq wrote

Trust me that wasn’t my intentions.

The point I was trying to make is, they’re pushing these asylum seekers further away, out of sight and out of mind.

The city uses Randall’s island as a means to satisfy the NIMBY’s. “Place them over there on that island, where we send everyone we don’t want in our neighborhood

3

app4that t1_ir0nb12 wrote

Funny part of poking fun of NIMBY is that once violent crime and/or property crime spikes no one wants derelicts, homeless, offenders or addicts in their neighborhood, I don’t care who they are.

And to be honest, if these places are not being actively monitored for criminal activity (and I don’t believe they ever are) then don’t put these places filled with people prone to crime in neighborhoods where families or seniors live.

12

OneRighteousDuder t1_ir159b2 wrote

You’re gonna put asylum seekers on sex offender island? Jeez…that’s the last thing these people need

−10

HypeDiego t1_ir1kfwn wrote

Has anyone one who is making these decisions ever been to Randall's Island? A few inches of rain and half the island goes under lol

15

Grass8989 t1_ir1o7p7 wrote

Since this is just a processing center, and they will be released into homeless shelters, it would probably make sense for them to be close to shelters. This was never intended on being a long term living arrangement.

0

richb83 t1_ir1pkpp wrote

I lived in that area for most of my life. There are buses that go to the beach but it's only during the summer. You'll need to walk for miles or depend on Uber for anything else.

5

aabbboooo t1_ir1qnf3 wrote

Many of the people who are assigned to shelters on Wards Island rely on the bus. In addition, the Wards Island shelter is one of the few in the city that can accommodate people with disabilities, so using pedestrian paths isn’t an option.

5

RayCiaf t1_ir2gdiw wrote

they can't find a spot to put 500 people indoors?

10

whateverisok t1_ir2iufu wrote

Well, a bit more than just put "people indoors":

"The centers will provide a connection to a full list of services and support asylum seekers' needs by immediately offering shelter, food, medical care, casework services, among other options at an expertly designed and climate-controlled, safe space."

So there's also the infrastructure and worker transportation to be considered

5

crmd t1_ir2jz3a wrote

I hope they put big state flags in each area to show who was sent from Texas, from Florida, etc. New York City stepping up to shelter people discarded by other states is a powerful image I would like Americans to see.

−3

sysyphusishappy t1_ir3a8p7 wrote

>New York City stepping up to shelter people

LOL. There were 15,000 migrants from Haiti in Del Rio Texas, a town with 35,000 people, in ONE DAY year. More than 2 million have been caught or encountered so far this year. There are tens of thousands being housed in Texas as we speak.

But yeah, very charitable for us to dump them on Randall's island after declaring a few hundred people in a city of 8 million "a crisis". Wait, let me guess, all the smug virtue signaling millionaires in Park Slope "didn't have the resources" to house a few hundred people just like the smug virtue signalling millionaires on martha's vineyard "didn't have the resources" for 50 people.

Luxury. Beliefs.

11

sysyphusishappy t1_ir3amlb wrote

>"The centers will provide a connection to a full list of services and support asylum seekers' needs by immediately offering shelter, food, medical care, casework services,

Weird how there are literally no other places on the Upper West Side, Park Slope, Brooklyn Heights, Williamsburg, or Battery Park city that can possibly provide food an shelter for a few hundred people. They just don't have "infrastructure" like a tent on Randall's Island does.

As with all their luxury beliefs, the virtue signaling millionaires prefer to dump the results of their voting onto poor people. This way they can still pretend to care on Instagram and awards shows but don't have to actually deal with the consequences of their votes.

Luxury. Beliefs.

13

tacitauthor t1_ir3p5x5 wrote

Orchard beach does not flood. It's on my daily bike ride.

0

the_bronx t1_ir4x42h wrote

Lol. No you don't unless you're retired there is no reason to commute past that beach it's in the middle of nowhere.

Also it absolutely floods specifically the parking lot. In fact go there right now dumbass.🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

4

the_bronx t1_ir4xcq2 wrote

We have armorys all over new york with bathrooms showers and heat! Yet the best we can do is a tent. Guess comic con takes precedence for convention centers too.

7

barzbub t1_ir53p4e wrote

Illegal became Undocumented Worker is now Asylum Seeker! What’s next, VOTER

9

throwaway_samaritan t1_ir66wsb wrote

That place is nice and quiet with great views. Nothing wrong with building tents there - tons of music festivals have been there. Go visit, and much safer than the Bronx and a quick walk to Manhattan. It is probably a big improvement. The asylum is in a big ass building with gated security - separated - nobody is getting in or out.

3

tacitauthor t1_ir78cie wrote

I'm retired and have lived in the area for 28 years. I ride about 20 miles a day on the bike paths and roads. I sometimes ride up to New Rochelle or a short ride to the end of City Island. The photo you are showing is just water pooling in the parking lot. The parking lot holds 12,000 cars and is blacktop. It's old and not perfectly level. The pooling water is just a few small sections. It's a bird bath for the sea gulls for a bit of time.

1

Cute-Locksmith8737 t1_it58wur wrote

Legal immigrants are acceptable. The country knows who they are, where they are from, why they are coming, how long they intend to stay, and other vital information. Illegal aliens are like burglars who sneak orbreak into a home. The country has no idea who illegal aliens are, where they are from, why they are coming, how long they plan to stay, and other necessary information. Illegals are more likely to be uneducated, filthy disease bearers that can pose a grave threat to a country's health and security.

1

Cute-Locksmith8737 t1_it5a23r wrote

Genuine asylum seekers are legal. Illegal aliens are not. Poverty is not a justification for asylum. Neither is gang warfare. Most illegals are not genuine asylum seekers. They are economic opportunists. They are some of the nastiest folks I have ever encountered.

1