Submitted by wdcmsnbcgay t3_y9puel in nyc
Unable-Ad3852 t1_it8lhxf wrote
Reply to comment by TeamMisha in LGBTQ+ Seniors to Have Access to Expanded Services in N.Y. by wdcmsnbcgay
> If I read this right, it just means income alone is not used to determine need..
Either way this is wrong and that's the problem. I don't have millions to retire and wouldn't be this but hurt if i did. The way in which this is phrased is like any other handout NY does. We have enough to serve 10000 people and we go by income in ascending order. By changing the rules someone with more income can jump in line to someone with less if they declare LGBTQ+. It doesn't specify what rules they apply now nor how much more income is the cutoff. They just let you know that because some poor people are LGBTQ+ they will discriminate against anyone who isn't and we should be ok with it because of equity.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments