Submitted by ctnutmegger t3_10mm3pa in nyc
RW3Bro t1_j64l036 wrote
Reply to comment by pton12 in NY attorney general weighs in: Harlem truck depot could be illegal by ctnutmegger
I have absolutely no faith that removing the ULURP and offloading the power to a city agency wouldn’t result in immediate and irreversible regulatory capture.
pton12 t1_j64n3di wrote
I mean, you could just remove the veto and have the whole council just vote on it. I don’t think we need to assign veto power to a regulatory agency.
D14DFF0B t1_j66awt2 wrote
I don't think the council should vote on every project. Set (hopefully liberal) zoning rules and let the market fix the problem.
pton12 t1_j66ces5 wrote
Sure, whatever the mechanism, just remove the local veto.
RW3Bro t1_j64v92y wrote
I don’t see how that amounts to anything but a rubber stamp for developers. A councilperson is obviously only accountable to the people who live in their district. They have zero incentive to care about the will of the people who live outside it.
ngroot t1_j64yrer wrote
> I don’t see how that amounts to anything but a rubber stamp for developers.
If the city council votes on it, they have an incentive to not do something that most people in the city hate.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments