Submitted by OkayestOfAllTime t3_10ofcda in personalfinance
I just recently bought a car, and at the time I thought I was doing something smart. I was quoted a simple interest rate of 2%, and I figured that between the time value of money and the fact that treasuries were at 3.75%, It would be better to take as much debt as possible and allocate the other money to compound.
Even though it is a short time horizon, I figured the compound effect over 4 years would greatly outway the penalty I am paying in interest. Then, I figured since inflation was at 4-5% (if not more) that 2% interest was essentially free money if I managed the extra cash well.
However, now that I am trying to think about it deeper, I'm not sure if my assumptions were correct. Especially when you take into account the depreciation and the fact that I am very likely underwater on the car, my grand plan might have been an oversight.
Also, I was watching "The Money Guys" and their rule of thumb on car purchases was 20% down, 3 years, and 8% of your annual salary. I obviously didn't do this (I did buy gap insurance which might have been a mistake as well)
Was my logic wrong?
Edit: I could have bought the car cash
Dorkus_Mallorkus t1_j6e94if wrote
With 2%, it was absolutely the right move to fully finance, as long as you can comfortably make payments and are living within your means. Depreciation is irrelevant, as long as you plan to keep the car for at least a few years.
As for the gap insurance, probably not the best move, but if it makes you feel secure, it's a small price to pay.