Submitted by OkayestOfAllTime t3_10ofcda in personalfinance
I just recently bought a car, and at the time I thought I was doing something smart. I was quoted a simple interest rate of 2%, and I figured that between the time value of money and the fact that treasuries were at 3.75%, It would be better to take as much debt as possible and allocate the other money to compound.
Even though it is a short time horizon, I figured the compound effect over 4 years would greatly outway the penalty I am paying in interest. Then, I figured since inflation was at 4-5% (if not more) that 2% interest was essentially free money if I managed the extra cash well.
However, now that I am trying to think about it deeper, I'm not sure if my assumptions were correct. Especially when you take into account the depreciation and the fact that I am very likely underwater on the car, my grand plan might have been an oversight.
Also, I was watching "The Money Guys" and their rule of thumb on car purchases was 20% down, 3 years, and 8% of your annual salary. I obviously didn't do this (I did buy gap insurance which might have been a mistake as well)
Was my logic wrong?
Edit: I could have bought the car cash
linuxhiker t1_j6e92n5 wrote
I would have paid cash and I wouldn't have bought a new car.
Also gap insurance is one of those, it can be helpful but most people think it's a scam. Even my step dad who is a car dealer thinks it's a scam.
Well when I was in my 20s I was upside down in a car (by a lot) and then then my wife (at the time) totalled it. Without gap insurance I would have been screwed instead we just walked away because we had gap insurance.