Unfamiliar_Word t1_ita6gis wrote
I would suppose that whatever work is being done was planned and scheduled a long time ago, which is typical of capital projects, and could not practically take the possibility of a particular major sporting event into consideration.
There are probably contracts, allocations of resources and long-term plans that are bult around the assumption of this work being done. What's more, as winter is approaching, suspending or cancelling the work could potentially delay it until next spring, which might disrupt other planned work premised upon the work being at least partially completed and the resources used in it available for other planned work. Not undertaking the work now could cause cascading problems some ways into the future.
martiny236 t1_ita8n8f wrote
There was nothing wrong with the bridge. More “work” needed resulting in a net zero
Unfamiliar_Word t1_ita92m5 wrote
So, may I assume that you are martiny236, P.E.?
martiny236 t1_ita9cxd wrote
I’m still shocked you typed up 4 paragraphs about the Ben Franklin bridge my guy
Unfamiliar_Word t1_ita9jbu wrote
Well, for one thing, it was two paragraphs.
martiny236 t1_itaaa73 wrote
You get real mad when people talk badly about bridges huh
martiny236 t1_ita9wl3 wrote
Are you a big bridge guy
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments