Also her 2017 campaign website reads like it was written by a bot:

>I have the competency and temperament to be a judge having been tested almost every day of my legal career. My client base requires an abundance of temperament and I’ve demonstrated excellent temperament throughout my career. They are almost exclusively low income criminal defendants and those domestic matters such as divorce and child custody issues which resonates highly charged issues and highly emotional clients. Often times requiring not only a listening ear; but also, to have the ability and fortitude to be able to talk them “off the ledge.” The very nature of my practice is a daily testament and excellent representation of my temperament.

>I know that to understand people’s actions, behavior, responses, you must take a “walk in their shoes” or be cognizant of how their journey, culture, upbringing effected their actions or decisions. If you fail to step outside of your comfort zone, you fail to grow and learn but worse as a judge you fail to understand the big picture of what is really going on and why. Based upon diversity differences, proper decisions may veer outside of your own personal spectrum of what is perceived as proper, nonetheless, be equally appropriate decisions based upon what makes us a diverse society.