Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_j5u3340 wrote

Reply to comment by Indiana_Jawns in How a Philadelphia antiviolence grant improperly funneled $76,000 to city police staffers by PhillyAccount

[removed]

−4

Indiana_Jawns t1_j5u6ptr wrote

Picking the 10 most recent posts, which are still over 30% related to crime (the fact that you used a different tag doesn't change that), and ignoring years of crime posting is a big LOL

Ignoring the rest of the fact that your "argument" holds no water is an even bigger LOL.

10

User_Name13 t1_j5u7mvb wrote

Move those goalposts more buddy.

You made the claim.

I provided evidence to the contrary.

I guess we'll just have to take your word on it since you won't cite any sources the way I just did.

You made a claim insulting my character and then basically said: "Trust me bro" as your evidence.

−1

Indiana_Jawns t1_j5ubf9u wrote

Pointing out that you used an arbitrary and non-representative sample isn't moving the goalposts, it's pointing out that your arguments are bad.

7

User_Name13 t1_j5ufjyi wrote

>For someone who almost exclusively posts about crime your sure do love to shit on attempts to reduce it.

That's what you said.

3 out of 10 of my last posts, which is what I've submitted over the past 2 months here, have been about crime.

Is 3 out of 10 "almost exclusively"?

You made the claim buddy.

Provide the evidence to back up your claim.

Should we just take your word for it?

Cuz I provided proof that would indicate otherwise.

1