Submitted by Necessary_Tadpole692 t3_10x97jk in philosophy
Johannes--Climacus t1_j7rgwz7 wrote
Reply to comment by AllanfromWales1 in Judith Butler: their philosophy of gender explained by Necessary_Tadpole692
It’s not actually contradictory, either. You can think someone’s ideas have or could have a negative effect on society even if they don’t intend for that
Normal-Flower4437 t1_j81488s wrote
Exactly. Justice, equality, and non-violence can be easily misdirected or co-opted.
Justice being the most obvious - justice for whom, and how, and for what? An overzealous desire for justice is one of the most destructive forces you can muster.
Equality is another. Equality for whom, and accomplished how? Violent redistribution seeks equality. A lot of antisemitism is rooted in outrage over inequality. The entire equality of outcome versus equality of opportunity debate we are having right now exists because those two values of equality are fundamentally in conflict.
Cautious_Piccolo942 t1_j7tmmf6 wrote
Like TRAs had absolutely no clue that their philosophy plus Hidden Predators inevitably leads the The Handmaid's Tale?
I dunno man that's hard to believe
Johannes--Climacus t1_j7tn5yq wrote
I literally have no idea what this means
[deleted] t1_j7tnlw6 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j7tnohp wrote
[removed]
BernardJOrtcutt t1_j7w7daz wrote
Your comment was removed for violating the following rule:
>Be Respectful
>Comments which consist of personal attacks will be removed. Users with a history of such comments may be banned. Slurs, racism, and bigotry are absolutely not permitted.
Repeated or serious violations of the subreddit rules will result in a ban.
This is a shared account that is only used for notifications. Please do not reply, as your message will go unread.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments