Submitted by greghickey5 t3_113ecst in philosophy
bassinlimbo t1_j8s2nxr wrote
I wrote a paper about this myself back in college, after reading Notes from the Underground and getting inspired. I didn't personally support determinism, rather thinking of things happening in the moment as they occur, almost like there was no future / past, just the reactions that are happening in the moment. Another aspect came to play was optimistic nihilism, and taking into account that even if true "free will" does not exist, the concept of it being true is enough to give life meaning. It doesn't have to be real to enjoy life, create meaning, experience things.
liquiddandruff t1_j8uu90k wrote
I subscribe to optimistic nihilism too.
> It doesn't have to be real to enjoy life, create meaning, experience things.
I'd just say here that those who say free ill is a lie, aren't saying to not enjoy life, create meaning, or experience things either.
The discourse around free will is orthogonal to all that. I tend to see a lot of people react defensively and unable to separate these concepts.
bassinlimbo t1_j8v1nte wrote
Yes exactly! It's really hard to explain to people who aren't as fluent in philosophy. They are very defensive over their "ability to choose" and can't separate the idea of true "free will" from what they really have. Most who disagree see it as a negative when I find it very neutral.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments