Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

WaveCore t1_j9uh1pw wrote

Why would you disagree? It's not a matter of trying hard enough or being educated enough, what we know and can know of our world is limited by our ability to investigate it.

Imagine you're in a room with various objects, and let's say that you don't have your senses of sight or smell. You'll fumble around the room, eventually stumbling into every object. All you can do to learn more about each object is to feel them, lick them, and hear them by tapping or patting them.

But no matter what, you will never be able to know these objects' color or how they smell. You cannot use the senses available to you to ever determine this information for sure, at best you can make assumptions. You'll never know what colors these objects have, but perhaps in the case of smell you can make an inference based on their taste.

So that's the idea with us trying to understand how the world works. We can only go as far as the tools available to us allow us to.

10

Otto_von_Boismarck t1_j9vnq1b wrote

Yea but science has become quite good at tapping, feeling, and licking. The fact we can't know how it "truly looks" is not necessarily needed. We know how atoms work almost perfectly without really knowing how they "look".

0

doctorcrimson t1_j9x0pht wrote

Maybe your ability to investigate it, but try not to speak for others.

−2