MonteChristo0321 OP t1_jbl0ted wrote
Reply to comment by zazzologrendsyiyve in I just published an article in The Journal of Mind and Behavior arguing that free will is real. Here is the PhilPapers link with free PDF. Tell me what you think. by MonteChristo0321
If we are "just" organic cells, then who's being misled by the realistic illusion? Can a cell experience an illusion? A cell can't experience anything at all. Only a non-reduced, complete functional pattern of billions of cells can experience something. So that complete pattern has very different properties and capacities than do "just cells."
That complete functional pattern of cells, when taken as a whole is called a person. So a person is not "just" cells. If we want to know whether a person has free will, it's a mistake to change the question to whether or not "just cells" have free will.
testearsmint t1_jblgjom wrote
The Cartesian approach is always very interesting in this regard. Consciousness implies at least some kind of self.
Out of curiosity:
-
In this case, do you believe consciousness encompasses the entirety of the person, as in the "I" that we can most certainly believe to exist (the one that sees, experiences, feels, etc.) is the same as the one that moves, acts, speaks, etc. and thus there is only one "self"?
-
As a follow-up, what do you think our existence consists of? Non-reductive physicalism, mind-body dualism, idealism, something else?
Psychonominaut t1_jbnusbq wrote
The idea and existence of reality and my ability to perceive it makes my head hurt....
testearsmint t1_jbog0k7 wrote
Right? Shit's crazy.
WrongdoerOk6812 t1_jblgc4o wrote
It's certainly a very interesting and possibly valid point that a person is not the same as just the collection of his cells... But then my question is what separates that person from said collection rather than being just a huge pile of complex cooperations between those cells in which the predetermined nature of everything just got a bit lost or impossible to perceive?
zazzologrendsyiyve t1_jbm1bkk wrote
We are not just the sum of our cells because emergent properties exist, and those always show complex behavior that are not intrinsically present in the individual cell.
Much like an ant: she doesn’t own the whole knowledge needed to run a colony, but sure as hell the whole colony does.
zazzologrendsyiyve t1_jbm1z6t wrote
Of course I don’t think that we are the exact same thing as a single organic cell. From a certain point of view we are completely different thing (in fact a cell is not made up of billions of cells).
I was just trying to show that from another point of view, cells show complex behavior as a whole, but you wouldn’t say that the single cell has free will.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments