Submitted by simonperry955 t3_yaolyw in philosophy
bumharmony t1_iu3tlgh wrote
Reply to comment by simonperry955 in The morality of fairness by simonperry955
We have not lived only to fulfill some ambiguous ”need” for millions of years now.
Also ethical naturalism and nonmoralism have been dead for a long time if they ever even were alive.
simonperry955 OP t1_iujxebr wrote
>We have not lived only to fulfill some ambiguous ”need” for millions of years now.
We all experience a pressure to thrive and survive, i.e., to do what will cause our inclusive thriving and surviving.
​
>ethical naturalism and nonmoralism
I looked it up: I think I'm an ethical non-naturalist. We feel we ought to fulfil ethical norms. I make a descriptive ought.
Morality has to evolve from the interplay between the needs and goals of humans, and their social and physical environment. Both of these are factual and non-moral.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments