Submitted by simonperry955 t3_yuv3c5 in philosophy
Skinonframe t1_ixa9qwz wrote
Reply to comment by simonperry955 in The structure of moral normativity by simonperry955
I find your normative system interesting and useful. But, as I have said, I also find it incomplete, inadequate and/or internally too static ("descriptive") to express agency, a vital aspect of morality. As I see it, to adequately describe moraluty we need to allow for individual moral agency potent enough by chance or choice to escape and even to re-define the normativity of the group/of groups. This seems especially so if we are to root morality in the underlying evolution of sentient, conscious and ultimately intelligent being, evolution itself being necessarily dynamically open ended. I will stop here. Thank you for the exchange.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments