Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

S-Vagus t1_iy9vx6v wrote

Or how about any emotion at a large enough scale or intensity of impact should be circulated or cycled amongst others so as to limit burden to the individual?

The less we burden the individual the greater our collective relief truly is.

5

moonaim t1_iyceg5z wrote

Unfortunately because of survival instincts emotions like fear and disgust are probably the most easily circulated ones.

3

S-Vagus t1_iycgslo wrote

If you can't evolve out of projective paranoia, then perish.

1

moonaim t1_iych5i8 wrote

Many people on Twitter can not, but they don't perish, the society as we know it might though.

I'm interested in social media and how it affects trends in nowadays society, that was the background of my comment.

2

S-Vagus t1_iycjeni wrote

In how digital diets affect digital diets? How strange. My online life and public life are very detached and uninvolved with each other no matter what I do.

1

moonaim t1_iycumgf wrote

Good for you maybe, but I'm more interested in general and statistical level of how mass behaviors evolve. Perhaps "living many lives" suits reading books and to game play, I'm not entirely certain it's a good (on average) for authentic relationships online and off-line. But everyone has their rights of course, I'm not advocating taking any of those away - just interested in how technology shapes culture

2

S-Vagus t1_iyenn4g wrote

The interstitial answers to the question of if I am an object or a person and how that is expressed?

0