Submitted by TheStateOfException t3_zj2go4 in philosophy
CyberCircumcizd t1_j0ibemc wrote
Reply to comment by CyberCircumcizd in Isaiah Berlin and The Power of Understanding Bad Ideas by TheStateOfException
I have to agree with others that writing is dangerous After reading it twice, I had no idea what the author was trying to do Although he appears to be against "globalisation", he has criticized liberal critics as "power hungry". It's like a high school story Facts are hard to deny because they don't exist
Sugary, often inappropriate words like alum are added in an attempt to expand the vocabulary.
I was surprised that this hot team got 300 votes
Answer
Tell your friends about it
Be careful
It is very appropriate
He followed him to the end
User transactions
Level 2 in
Gray on website
·.
A great part of this article is about dealing with negative thoughts He said something very stupid: negative thoughts are not good He gives random information without explaining or understanding what he is saying In support of the negative view supporting negative emotions, he cites the following passage from Russia
[It is based on] a historical concept, which can be made continuously and not once in the human mind
This story is about the development of individual and global assets (especially when people become socially connected, losing their identities but being empowered in other ways). "They pile negative thoughts on each other," he said. These are many examples of his ignorance of the author's subject
This article is not my best
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments