Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Charlesinrichmond OP t1_j6jvfen wrote

This is probably a good idea. It's been proposed a lot over the years I gather but gets push back

−18

jason375 t1_j6jxn12 wrote

Is there enough room in either Henderson or John Marshall to consolidate it into one 6-12th grade school? I don’t think it should be necessary to close both and increase the student/teacher ratio at other schools in a teacher shortage.

20

gamerthrowaway_ t1_j6jy42w wrote

Just want to point out, it's really hard to swallow the idea that they can (let alone should) close 5 schools (specifically 3 elementary schools) and then blow the cash to rebuild Fox in the middle of a premier upper class neighborhood...

38

BureauOfBureaucrats t1_j6k5s3p wrote

It’s also hard to swallow the fact we wouldn’t even need to replace Fox at all had RPS and the City been competent.

Living here several years has demonstrated over and over again this city does not value competence or basic upkeep.

17

heraus t1_j6k9dej wrote

Young proposes a version of this every once in a while and my bet is that he simply aims to drive a broader conversation that speaks to efficiencies. He likes to ruffle feathers. Closing (all) those 5 schools, specifically, isn't going to happen, but having the discussion could still be helpful in other ways. Me, I'm not a fan of closing schools for several reasons...And certainly someone other than Young himself would need to study which if any schools would even be up for discussion.

12

55V35lM t1_j6kf5sr wrote

RPS usually doesn’t embrace suggestions related to efficiently managing their school buildings - they seem to prefer to poorly maintain as many buildings as possible (and need to have unused buildings on hand when one is unexpectedly closed for mold or fire damage - true story).

8

AndThenThereWasQueso t1_j6ki75l wrote

Whether it saves money or not, it will make educator’s jobs harder. I promise you that.

75

BureauOfBureaucrats t1_j6knpu5 wrote

That is the most thoughtful write-up on this issue I’ve read.

I agree with regards to the community centers and the surplus. This is why I cannot trust the city; they’re always speaking a double narrative. We’re either too broke to afford schools or we’re flush enough to afford tax rebates. We can’t have it both ways.

8

Both-Internal-6970 t1_j6kv3kd wrote

I think it's a really bad idea, what about all the kids that live near those schools, they'd be forced to get driven/ ride the bus to a futher school. I hated my rps high school experience as too many crazy kids already, more would only contribute to the problem for kids that aren't wild. Trying to compact all those kids in a few schools is overwhelming for everyone involved, there'd be a fight everyday. And they wonder why nobody wants to be a teacher, those that have never attended an RPS high school can't relate it's literal insanity.

61

Ill_Engineer_8746 t1_j6l0lzn wrote

Young brings this up every few years. Let’s preface this with: he’s the absolute worst BUT

He’s not wrong. There are some serious discrepancies in school sizes that are an atrocious waste of school funds and lead to inequitable distribution of resources. Compare Henderson to River City or Swansboro to Broad Rock.

However, rezoning schools and moving students around like that is an extremely complex issue and not one that Richmond is prepared to take on given that they can’t even decide on a calendar or curriculum.

31

TotalIndividual3511 t1_j6lla8k wrote

Just curious, is Young a registered Republican or somehow affiliated with the Republicans in any way? His actions over the years have led me to contemplating this question, but I can't find anything online about it.

2

RVAnus t1_j6mo69r wrote

The fact that you are getting down voted for this just goes to show how detached from reality some folks on here are.

I'd be very curious to know how many of them have kids in RPS or actually talk to RPS teachers or admin.

3

RVAnus t1_j6mqlhb wrote

I don't think you're necessarily wrong here, but I think the catch is that there are currently no functional alternatives. The result is that city schools gets stuck in an endless feedback loop of poor performance.

3

RVAnus t1_j6n6nz0 wrote

I agree, and good teachers are where the rubber meets the road in education. Good teachers deserve good pay, good facilities, and good administration. All of these cost money that isn't there without full, or close to full, utilization. And even if you could snap your fingers and get full utilization, there are the challenges of years of deferred maintenance due to years of chronic underfunding. There aren't easy answers and there are way more paths that lead to failure than success. The only way out is to honestly acknowledge the challenges and tradeoffs and come up with a balanced solution with the correct incentives for long term success.

4

DarDarRules t1_j6na5bb wrote

The problem here is that yes, this will help with the administrative bloat that takes up a lot of budget costs. But it doesn’t solve the systemic issue of why that administrative bloat exists, which is unfortunately held at the state and federal level.

−1

Lavenderlaurel t1_j6oqht6 wrote

This is so dumb. It's going to overcrowd and overwhelm other schools. Not to mention the Richmond neighborhood feuds that may come into play as a result of forcing students to switch schools. Last year the rezoning caused multiple fights at several middle/high schools. It's going to happen again if they close those schools down. Not to mention RPS's central office is already an absolute mess. Focus on hiring people to fill central office vacancies before touching a topic like this....

1