Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

AutoModerator t1_j7u0yh5 wrote

Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

Phoenix5869 t1_j7u5o9o wrote

IN MICE

which doesn’t translate to humans most of the time

−12

SemanticTriangle t1_j7u82bo wrote

Perhaps my understanding is not correct? Have we not essentially figured out that the increasing frequency of food related allergies is related to the topical application of food derivative proteins in a largely functionless manner in cosmetic and cleaning products? Baby body encounters new protein in wrong context (like peanut derivatives in a skin cream), arranges immune reaction, then later deploys that reaction when the child finally gets around to eating that thing rather than having it rubbed on its skin?

Is that model not well enough validated, or is my understanding flawed?

If this is the major contributor, isn't this an easily soluble phenomenon by subtraction, rather than addition?

Example sources:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5682223/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16805419/

https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/12/12/3830

And similar citations

−5

Pleasant__Bumblebee t1_j7ub03o wrote

I was just thinking about this the other day. How it would be awesome to go travelling without that constant anxiety in the back of my mind. that there’s a chance I could die at any second

26

[deleted] t1_j7vf33s wrote

It seems like allergic reactions are far too varied to explain with one grand theory like this. It's more likely a list of causes ranked in order of occurrence or such, not just one main cause.

So SURE maybe there is some correlation with use of food in other products, but to assume that's the one big cause that causes all food allergies would be a massive leap of faith more than anything science would support.

6

almostcyclops t1_j7w3o4f wrote

I know right? My spouse has a fish allergy. Not as immediately deadly as most peanut allergies but just from being near it she can still get swelling, irritation, and in extreme cases throat closing. She can't eat certain foods at many restaurants, cant eat at all at certain resteraunts, can't even go in some grocery stores or even walk down certain streets in bad areas. But we live in the Pacific Northwest so it's everywhere. Could we visit Japan? Probably not. Could we visit London? No idea. Fish and chips are popular there but I just don't know if its popular enough that you can smell it in the air.

Hopefully this kind of research continues to make breakthroughs for all allergies.

9

Apag78 t1_j7w594w wrote

I hope this actually sees the light of day for people in the near future. This would be so amazing for my son.

3

jomosexual t1_j7w74fu wrote

I have a general allergy to most fruits in vegetable in different forms. Also constant pollen and dust allergy. Its probably a mild immune disease but if I could take a pill to just stop it I would try a banana or have a papaya salad

2

oniony t1_j7whpom wrote

There aren't all that many fish & chip shops in London or the UK. You could easily spend a week in central London and not see any of them. I'd definitely avoid fried food in any pubs though, as they often share a deep fat fryer.

2