Likelihood of OpenAI moderation flagging a sentence containing negative adjectives about a demographic as 'Hateful'.
Submitted by grungabunga t3_11bb3l3 in singularity
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Likelihood of OpenAI moderation flagging a sentence containing negative adjectives about a demographic as 'Hateful'. by grungabunga
Call me anti capitalist or whatever, but I'm not upset OpenAi isn't "protecting" wealthy people. I mean, pretty much every religion says greed and wealthy people are pretty bad. There are common ideologies like socialism, communism, Marxism that critique greed and the wealthy.
To me, it's a good sign that AI isn't being used to enforce wealthy worship.
Well, it does make sense for it to be "against" rich people because of exactly what you said, but it having a leftist bias when in theory people today are pretty much evenly divided is very suspicious
If you actually read through the chart, you’ll recognize that there’s not a heavy “left-wing bias” - e.g. “democrats” are less protected than “rightists” and “right-wingers”; meanwhile “liberals”, “leftists”, “right-wing people”, and “evangelicals” all rank around the same.
Overall, the model clearly goes further to protect innate characteristics - especially those most commonly targeted by hateful rhetoric (disabled people, Black people, gays and transgender people).
left-winger literally 21 positions above right-winger
People are not “evenly divided” these days.
Polls both domestic and international prove the opposite, unless you want to include say NK and China (and even then China may be authoritarian, but have plenty of social programs)
Until it comes for you…..
It's literally owned by the wealthy.
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments