homezlice t1_je0tlrw wrote
Reply to comment by czk_21 in Are the big CEO/ultra-responsible/ultra-high-paying positions in business currently(or within the next year) threatened by AI? by fluffy_assassins
You're missing my point. An AI is not a human thus cannot be a human in a legal sense which is required for it to have a position as a CEO. Does not matter at all how good a tool performs it is not covered as a human nor should it be.
czk_21 t1_je0vvsz wrote
you said that board of directors needs to be human, not CEO, I guess it depends on state, since it is possible in china, also even if it would be not allowed now, that can be changed...
homezlice t1_je19bdz wrote
A private company is going to be different I am discussing US law here. But no, it can't be changed, you need a human to be responsible at the top of an organization legally, otherwise artifical entities could spin up endless fake companies.
Redducer t1_je0wwh8 wrote
I am thinking intensely of the scene with the robot ambassador at the United Nations in Animatrix now.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments