What part did I get wrong exactly? I don't mean it is being devious, just that is doesn't distinguish between repeating training data nearly verbatim, or generating novel sentences.
"it doesn't distinguish between" that and making stuff up. It does repeat training data nearly verbatim on occasion. Asking for a list of unique names for cards in a game I am designing, it just gave me MTG card names...
uhdonutmindme t1_jdpqy4v wrote
>but I can imagine
Translation: I can give you examples of inventions/innovations talked about on the internet and present them as though they are my own.