Submitted by Ishynethetruth t3_122aot3 in singularity
[removed]
Comments
sumane12 t1_jdq0feg wrote
This is not how it's working.
uhdonutmindme t1_jdq30qw wrote
What part did I get wrong exactly? I don't mean it is being devious, just that is doesn't distinguish between repeating training data nearly verbatim, or generating novel sentences.
scooby1st t1_jdq3nsp wrote
Million dollar ideas are worth pennies. Don't mean shit until its actually made and sold
sumane12 t1_jdq6k9f wrote
If it repeated training data verbatim, hallucinations would not be an issue.
uhdonutmindme t1_jdq6rf8 wrote
sumane12 t1_jdqa3ju wrote
If it repeated training data nearly verbatim, hallucinations would not be an issue.
Akimbo333 t1_jdqf7jp wrote
uhdonutmindme t1_jdqy4b1 wrote
"it doesn't distinguish between" that and making stuff up. It does repeat training data nearly verbatim on occasion. Asking for a list of unique names for cards in a game I am designing, it just gave me MTG card names...
uhdonutmindme t1_jdpqy4v wrote
>but I can imagine
Translation: I can give you examples of inventions/innovations talked about on the internet and present them as though they are my own.