Submitted by MelodiGreig t3_1264hie in singularity
I'm noticing people are talking about UBI without really considering how it'll work or how it'll still allow for a functioning economy/market. They have this simple idea of just "oh just use UBI"
Now im no economist but a few issues i've noticed with this is:
-UBI = everyone on it will have the same amount of money, for living costs and maybe a reasonable amount for leisure.
Won't this cause a huge reduction in sales of multiple kinds of luxury items that now cant be afforded and limit what kind of businesses can actually run in this type of economy?
-Not just that but it also feels like the government will eventually run out of money. UBI goes to civilians, UBI spent on stuff (food, water etc) money goes to company owners which is taxed at a % and goes back to the government.
The assumption here is that these company owners/CEOs benefitting from automation will also be spending their money which means the government eventually gets the amount they sent out back.
However, how much are you willing to bet that these CEOs wont be utterly self sufficient and have no need to spend money on basically anything at all?
I'm not sure if I can even consider the implications if they invest that money elsewhere as well to try and grow it infinitely like they already do now.
So in summary - many nonessential luxury business product based businesses will die, CEOs will be self sufficient and wont have to participate in the economy by buying things, gov likely will receive less money back than they send out over time... and these are just the problems I could think of in my fluey state lol.
So it comes across to me that in reality this most likely wont work- its either fullblown AGI post-scarcity communist paradise or nothing when mass unemployment becomes a thing.
Tell me what i'm missing?
Dyeeguy t1_je7hwoa wrote