SkyeandJett t1_jdy9xxi wrote on March 28, 2023 at 1:50 AM

That's like saying we only experience the world in discrete electrical impulses.

[deleted] OP t1_jdyap70 wrote on March 28, 2023 at 1:56 AM

[deleted]

DaffyDuck t1_jdyd32h wrote on March 28, 2023 at 2:14 AM

You’re being overly reductive. Move up a level and look at it as a neural network that is using weights and biases. It’s not exactly the same but is still fairly similar to how neurons in the brain are believed to function.

Iffykindofguy t1_jdyallx wrote on March 28, 2023 at 1:55 AM

How do you know we dont experience the world in 0s and 1s and our brain just translates it for you? We dont understand our own consciousness, how can we hope to understand another entity?

anti-nadroj t1_jdyaucl wrote on March 28, 2023 at 1:57 AM

I don’t, that’s why I wanted to know everyone’s perspective on it.

Evan_jansen t1_jdy9xdf wrote on March 28, 2023 at 1:50 AM

100% agree. I have always found it hard to believe AGI will ever be sentient for this exact reason. How can it go from being a computer to say human, how does it cross this boundary 🤷🏼.

Azuladagio t1_jdyay0w wrote on March 28, 2023 at 1:58 AM

It won't be human because it ain't human. Made by humans, but not human.

AGI will only experience the world in 0s and 1s

Comments