AnOnlineHandle t1_jdyx2fa wrote
Reply to comment by the_new_standard in The goalposts for "I'll believe it's real AI when..." have moved to "literally duplicate Einstein" by Yuli-Ban
It's easy to show that AI can do more than it was trained on with a single neuron. Just build an AI which converts Metric to Imperial, just a single conversion, calibrating that one multiplier neuron from a few example measurements. It will then be able to give outputs for far more than its training data, because it's learned the underlying logic.
the_new_standard t1_jdyz1s3 wrote
So here's the thing. I don't really care about what it's technically classified as.
For me I categorize AI but what end result it can produce. And at the moment it can produce writing, analysis, images and code. If any of that were coming from a human we wouldn't need to have an argument about training data. It doesn't matter how it does what it does. What matters is the end result.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments