Submitted by Veleric t3_122q2cc in singularity
eJaguar t1_jdrz8vc wrote
Reply to comment by NonDescriptfAIth in How are you viewing the prospect of retirement in the age of AI? by Veleric
>People usually die soon after retirement. If the nature of 'work' is enjoyable and promotes a healthy lifestyle, why not extend it as long as possible?
that's a feature for the modern aristocracy. make them as much money as possible, and then die after you are unable to do so any longer so they don't have to pay taxes to support your deprived elderly ass. iirc like a quarter of people or something like that don't make it to retirement age anyway, toss a coin twice and see how many times in lands on the time face twice in a row, that's the chance of you not even seeing retirement age, especially in good health.
these are very pretty assumptions that i don't think take into account the automated kill drones that are going to be around this time. misouri effectively made it illegal to be homeless, the poor are viewed with contempt in the USA, even by other poor people. unless something dramatically changes culturally in fly-over USA, things seem like they're just going to get really fucking grim for many people, as they already are now.
NonDescriptfAIth t1_jds2d28 wrote
>these are very pretty assumptions that i don't think take into account the automated kill drones that are going to be around this time.
OP asked for practical advice to do with retirement. I mused on the possibility that things go very wrong by saying:
>this would be a dystopian place unworthy of any meaningful planning now beyond 'buy land and build a bunker'.
I'm well aware of the negative possibilities that stem from AI.
If we continue on our current trajectory the odds that this doesn't end in a nuclear apocalypse is near 0.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments