Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

whenhaveiever t1_ir6ndm2 wrote

That's what I'm wondering. How much of this is actual useful research that advances the field and how much is sociologists plugging things into Dall-E and having opinions about the results?

But also, there's no possible way for any human to keep up with 4000 new papers per month. We almost need AI to read the AI papers and tell us what the good ones are.

33

MercuriusExMachina t1_ir6wnx0 wrote

Exactly. The bitter lesson would seem to indicate that compute is the determining factor, not algorithmic innovation.

But it's good to see that research is keeping up with compute.

8