This is an interesting article, but I don't see it as particularly insightful.

After all, of course our experience is technically a memory -- if there is even the tiniest fraction of delay in an occurrence and our processing of it, it's a memory.

This seems to be describing the obvious with fancier terms.

Say you touch a hot stove. There is a short but real time delay before your nerves register the heat, send the signal to your brain, are processed as pain, and a course of action (remove hand!) decided.

By the time all this happens, some T quantity of Time has passed. Well, yes -- we're always a bit behind the ball, and by definition everything is a memory.

But is this a new concept or particularly useful? I'm not seeing it.