Comments
Denpol88 t1_iwto0fy wrote
100 millimeters per second
themanhimself91 t1_iwuelu4 wrote
Im confused. 100 milimeters = 10 cm.
10 cm = 3.93 inches
So 3.93 inches per second?
Denpol88 t1_iwunbu9 wrote
İt was written nm not mm
MarginCalled1 t1_iwuqrug wrote
This reply chain has me imagining someone strapping a NOS bottle to their 3D printer and somehow finding a way to plumb it in. "Here we go babyy!" as he cranks it on.
Several days later this article is published.
Sandbar101 t1_iwut2xr wrote
Industrial nano factory here we come
Objective-Patient-37 t1_iwuwbco wrote
would this be capable of printing a highly ductile translucent polymer?
OtterProper t1_iwwj3nn wrote
I'm also interested in this notion. 🤓🤙🏼
Objective-Patient-37 t1_iwxpxta wrote
Cool!
what project are you working on where you'd use this?
OtterProper t1_iwxzwc6 wrote
Not to be that guy, but it's my understanding that "ductility" is not the term for polymers, related to the difference between certain metallic crystal structures allowing plastic deformation (ductile) and the molecular breakage of thermoset polymers (i.e. not ductile), correct?
Objective-Patient-37 t1_iwzeqam wrote
Absolutely correct.
My mistake
OtterProper t1_iwzqhr9 wrote
What project are you looking forward to using such in though, I'm curious
Shelfrock77 OP t1_iwsw2lj wrote
“A new nanoscale 3D printing material developed by Stanford University engineers may provide superior structural protection for satellites, drones, and microelectronics
An improved lightweight, a protective lattice that can absorb twice as much energy as previous materials of a similar density has been developed by engineers for nanoscale 3D printing.”
I’m going to build a spaceship, I love open source😋