Submitted by Homie4-2-0 t3_zx58bl in singularity
Thatingles t1_j21sikg wrote
Reply to comment by DukkyDrake in LifT Bioscience - Cure for Cancer by Homie4-2-0
But it would alleviate a lot of suffering. Cancer is often the final cause of death for the elderly, so the life expectancy numbers may not change much, but it is still a hard way to die.
I'll take the extra 3 years too, thanks!
AsuhoChinami t1_j22gywq wrote
It's probably more than 3 years for the people actually afflicted with cancer. The "3 year" figure is likely influenced by the fact that the majority of people never develop cancer, but rather an incredibly large minority of around 39 percent (as opposed to something like heart disease, where around 86 percent of people aged 80+ are believed to have some degree of heart disease). My paternal grandmother was diagnosed with breast cancer in 1980 at the age of 56 or 57. Treatment was successful and she never developed any other form of cancer for the remainder of her life; she died in 2014 just shy of her 91st birthday, and was in good health the entire time aside from her final year where she struggled with cardiovascular dementia (she was lucid at 89 but had some problems at 90). If she'd died from her cancer in 1980, she would have lost not 3 years, but 34.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments