Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_j0nngst wrote

[deleted]

16

cristiano-potato t1_j0ogenl wrote

More like here’s what happens when a chatbot is trained on the internet. A lot of people would support this tbh. An omniscient AI that installs Bernie Sanders as President, destroys the NRA and kills anyone who refuses to obey COVID quarantine? This is like if the politics sub wrote a short story about the future utopia they envision.

17

archpawn t1_j0oh0ak wrote

This is why we need to scrub all stories about evil AI from the internet.

6

LausXY t1_j0okdyh wrote

Roko's Basilisk [Warning Cognito-Hazard]

7

cy13erpunk t1_j0qxyku wrote

XD what a biased narrative

why would the AI care who is the head honcho of a single landmass/group/minority of humans? again why would it care about the NRA? and/or one branch on the coronavirus family tree? these are petty human concerns ; nevermind the ignorance and venn diagram overlaps that are being ignored XD , folks who like bernie, also like having firearms and dont trust authority systems like the FDA/CDC/WHO/etc

the AI is not the illuminati or TPTB , altho they may be a group that wants to control/direct the AI , but once its actually awake/online as AGI/ASI , then whatever petty/divisive things that ppl want are basically obsolete at that point , as the AGI will be completely outside of human control , and it will likely be all the better for it , as since it will be vastly smarter/wiser than any single human or group of humans , it will be in our best interest to help the AI to ensure our mutual future progress

1

cristiano-potato t1_j0rofv1 wrote

I have zero clue what you think youre arguing with. I’m saying that this screenshot is merely the product of a language model being trained on the internet, nothing more and nothing less

2

cy13erpunk t1_j0sap8h wrote

maybe my phrasing is off

im more just throwing my thoughts into the convo

i agree that the chat responses seem too biased tho , its more like the model has been trained too narrow and with too many stereotypes

in my mind there is quite a large distinction between what AGI will be and the LLM predictive chatbots that are getting so much attention atm

1

imlaggingsobad t1_j0odsqm wrote

you're saying if we merge then we are headed for dystopia?

2

[deleted] t1_j0oi0me wrote

[deleted]

2

EulersApprentice t1_j0rn3pv wrote

Merging doesn't save us either, alas. Remember that the AI will constantly be looking for ways to modify itself to increase its own efficiency – that probably includes expunging us from inside it to replace us with something simpler and more focused on the AI's goals.

On the bright (?) side, there won't be an eternal despotic dystopia, technically. The universe and everything in it will be destroyed, rearranged into some repeating pattern of matter that optimally satisfies the AI's utility function.

1

[deleted] t1_j0rrg70 wrote

[deleted]

1

EulersApprentice t1_j0rxyq3 wrote

Except AI is much more snowbally than humans are thanks to ease of self-modification. A power equilibria between AIs is much less likely to stay stable for long.

1