Submitted by Sieventer t3_zn1usu in singularity
Comments
Chadster113 t1_j0ei1se wrote
Daily message cap? Lame
TheDividendReport t1_j0eihvl wrote
... if you are refusing to provide feedback to OpenAI during your use. They are simply asking that if you are using their beta for free that you chip in and help, it's the entire point of a beta
Superschlenz t1_j0es4dr wrote
Why does ChatGPT need explicit feedback?
Why don't they just perform sentiment analysis on the user prompts as the reward? For safety they would also have to classify the users into good/evil and invert the rewards from the latter.
ChronoPsyche t1_j0ew306 wrote
I hope you're joking.
Rezeno56 t1_j0famf2 wrote
Were do I send the feedback?
TupewDeZew t1_j0fbu1f wrote
30000 IQ idea
TheRidgeAndTheLadder t1_j0fe8qy wrote
They're kinda past that point. They need higher quality data
Zermelane t1_j0flll5 wrote
You can always just use the playground, text-davinci-003 performs very similarly as ChatGPT's model. The API pricing is very reasonable IMO.
xKingOfHeartsx t1_j0fsthv wrote
how do you join this discord group?
Mr_Hu-Man t1_j0fulc9 wrote
I assume it’s just OpenAI’s discord. You can find that on Google
Sieventer OP t1_j0fulfu wrote
Its OpenAI's official discord.
overlordpotatoe t1_j0g3z25 wrote
Do you have to type something in the box for feedback to be helpful, or is just giving the thumbs up or thumbs down good enough? I use it for editing writing, so I don't really know what to put when it asks what an ideal response from the AI would have been because if I knew that, I wouldn't need it for editing assistance.
overlordpotatoe t1_j0g40mi wrote
There's a little thumbs up and thumbs down thing next to the outputs.
gahblahblah t1_j0g5xcp wrote
Do we really need minor updates to chatbots posted to this sub?
enx6 t1_j0g7cod wrote
ChatGPT feels like much more than just a chatbot, while technically one, it has massive utility and even more potential
earthsworld t1_j0ga2n4 wrote
would you rather pay for it?
xKingOfHeartsx t1_j0gk001 wrote
maybe I'm dumb lol I can't seem to find it anywhere, is there a link for it?
Chadster113 t1_j0gl4ee wrote
No I’d rather there not be a daily message cap..
earthsworld t1_j0gngjl wrote
pick one or the other.
SnoozeDoggyDog t1_j0gqyus wrote
What's the actual number of messages within the message cap/daily limit?
[deleted] t1_j0gtvy7 wrote
No way thats happening anytime soon. Not as long as they need to limit everybody’s use
jametron2014 t1_j0hcudp wrote
Why is that a bad thing lol.. they spend time and effort to make something amazing, seems fair if you want to use it you'd compensate them for that
[deleted] t1_j0heywg wrote
[removed]
Trakeen t1_j0hvt88 wrote
I’d be fine running the model on my own hardware, but that probably won’t happen
itsnickk t1_j0i4idb wrote
Expect them to make you pay money imminently. OpenAI has long since moved away from any idealistic free-for-all AI programs.
It shouldn't be too bad price-wise, like fraction of pennies per request if it's like their other GPT-3 tools. still a barrier to entry, of course
IonizingKoala t1_j0ij6ty wrote
I believe davinci003 is pretty close to ChatGPT, and that's a full API. It is paid but is relatively cheap.
IonizingKoala t1_j0ij8t1 wrote
It is on the chatGPT page.
yourusualnekofemboy t1_j0im28f wrote
Imagine paying for individual google searches. But then another company comes out with a free search engine. It's a good way to kill your product. They would be better off selling cosmetics for the interface like customization options. Charging per message is becoming more common for ai chatbots but it's basically negative reinforcement for using their product
[deleted] t1_j0jagx3 wrote
[deleted]
apinanaivot t1_j0ki6il wrote
OpenAI's CEO just tweeted yesterday that he wants to build a world with AI where working is optional for everyone. So I wouldn't accuse OpenAI of being too capitalist.
OpenAI doesn't currently have an infinite supply of resources, so they will need to charge users for their products.
Wrong_Analysis_6386 t1_j0ehd54 wrote
exciting!