[deleted] t1_j3eb9jq wrote
[removed]
FomalhautCalliclea OP t1_j3erqxl wrote
An argumentation to such a lapidary statement would have made your post much more interesting.
You should also abstain yourself of judging who is skeptical and who is overly optimistic: i lean quite heavily on the former side. And you would be surprised at the amount of critical povs that get upvoted here.
Finally, arguing against the roganites is the most constructive way of putting forward your ideas, instead of being a cliché of a 1990's curmurdgeon neckbeard programmer.
[deleted] t1_j3gyjpe wrote
[removed]
FomalhautCalliclea OP t1_j3j0sal wrote
You managed to do worse than a post without arguments : a post without arguments but with strawmen.
I never state that multi-modality brings "intelligence" to those models.
Breakthroughs haven't happened yet (congratulations, you have a notion of time !), but we can expect them in some fields or areas of interests, like the nuclear fusion example could have made you guess : we don't know exactly how to produce the mechanism (or if it's even possible), but we know on what general issues we need to work.
As for your speculations about my knowledge, maybe you should start trying to understand what is written before speculating on things you can't have access to.
The only one here that is speculating is you : the options my poll propose are different from each other and do not represent my opinions, otherwise, the sixth ("it's impossible") would contradict the 5 first ones.
But understanding and speculating do not seem to be your best skills...
>maybe you should actually learn
those skills.
[deleted] t1_j3kdx34 wrote
[removed]
FomalhautCalliclea OP t1_j3l5p9t wrote
>you included it as an answer in a poll about the steps to get to “intelligence” like it somehow matters
The precise goal of a poll is to present every opinion, even the ones you deem as ludicrous and don't have as your own. Your reaction would be as if you saw a political poll listing options from far-left to far-right and were revolted that the author was far-right because the option was included.
Your writing manages to be messy and short at the same time, just like your reasoning and reading abilities.
Even better, you lack self-awareness, being the very one that used insults.
You reproach others of not knowing what they're talking about when you didn't even understand what they were saying nor the very concept of a poll.
You're having a conversation in an alternate reality with yourself, so i'll let you guys have fun between yourselves.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments