[deleted]

You kind of had me until this:

>You may even have an ai that could calculate everything within the observable universe down to the nanosecond that could potentially predict the future.

What? How do you get measurements to set initial conditions for the simulation? What about chaos arising from measurement error? Size of the quantum computer (seriously how large would this have to be?)? This is impossible, implausible.

[deleted]

I see.

See https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9907009 — it’s almost completely certain that the human brain is a classical system.

Were likely still a number of years away from having practical and useful quantum computers. With that being said, I haven’t seen any substantial evidence which suggests that QM/QC is a requirement/necessity for the development of AGI.

That’s not really how quantum computers work. They are only faster on some specific problems, not many of which are actually useful. One of those is simulating quantum systems, but you need more qubits than you have particles in the simulation so the computer would have to be bigger than the thing you are simulating.

I just read how the transfer of information across fiber optics is a big issue that is being solved. I suppose that once it is engineers can connect supercomputers across the continent to work together in processing complex algorithms. At this stage even classical supercomputers are valuable with a.i. technology and with the new 1,000 qubit computer we're going to be jammin.

I think AGI introduced this year and 2024 will be implementation and the beginning of a big transition.