[removed]
Comments
Elbynerual t1_itcjh1s wrote
A big one, with a good camera and a tracking device plus the necessary filters and then post processing - technically yes.
With the naked eye looking through a decent telescope, no
mongolsruledchina t1_itclok5 wrote
This is the answer I believe the poster was looking for.
candygirl66 t1_itcpkdq wrote
I dont understand why people takes the time to tell you that, but not to explain the time it takes for light to reach us
space-ModTeam t1_itcus5y wrote
Hello u/sagitarius-b, your submission "Are the pillars of creation observable with a simple mail-order telescope?" has been removed from r/space because:
- Such questions should be asked in the "All space questions" thread stickied at the top of the sub.
Please read the rules in the sidebar and check r/space for duplicate submissions before posting. If you have any questions about this removal please message the r/space moderators. Thank you.
MinchkenB t1_itcvtga wrote
I understand the time dilation part. I just thought you it was one of those facts that pillars of creation was gone..
sagitarius-b t1_itd7eix wrote
Thanks you!
[deleted] OP t1_itd7glf wrote
[removed]
sagitarius-b t1_itd88r0 wrote
Oh.. nice! Thanks for sharing.
But 3.5 hours exposure time is kind of crazy.
rip1980 t1_itd954y wrote
(Relatively) Not a lot of photons coming from that tiny patch of sky 6500 light years away.
rip1980 t1_itcjdiw wrote
Technically, visible with the naked eye. As you go up in optics, you'll get more detail. A nicer higher end home telescope would probably be sufficient and satisfying. It takes time and optics to gather enough light to make it what I think you are expecting.
An example of someone doing this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rqt6JaA_K6o