Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

MrZorg58 t1_j21r51m wrote

Same as the Shuttles, they were all designed to do it.

−2

misterjive t1_j21w1pn wrote

Because if you decided to tilt the Saturn V at an angle on the launchpad it'd fall over and that would be bad.

−4

the_fungible_man t1_j21wgcw wrote

>Why wasn’t the module adjusted on the launch pad so this wasn’t necessary?

Several reasons.

The launch pad/tower infrastructure (elevators, hold down clamps, umbilicals) are designed to mate with the launch vehicle in a specific orientation. But even if you could rotate the whole kit and caboodle, it wouldn't help:

For launches with non-instantaneous launch windows, such as the Apollo missions, the trajectory the vehicle will take once it clears the launch tower varies depending on when liftoff actually occurs. Therefore, there is no pad orientation which would eliminate the need for the roll maneuver in every case.

14

gagaron_pew t1_j21x87n wrote

its easier to roll the vehicle in the air than to build the whole launch infrastructure on a turntable.

8

DudeWithAnAxeToGrind t1_j22dtuy wrote

Because rolling the vehicle in flight is trivially simple, while attempting to roll entire launch pad to be "properly" oriented at the moment when launch actually happens is very hard.

4

SpartanJack17 t1_j22ktp8 wrote

Hello u/Oncey1234, your submission "Apollo role manoeuvre" has been removed from r/space because:

  • Such questions should be asked in the "All space questions" thread stickied at the top of the sub.

Please read the rules in the sidebar and check r/space for duplicate submissions before posting. If you have any questions about this removal please message the r/space moderators. Thank you.

1