Submitted by Corbulo2526 t3_10daikx in space
Adorable-Effective-2 t1_j4msfrv wrote
Reddit didn’t read the article apparently. ITS NOT FOR WEAPONS
judgingyouquietly t1_j4n5phs wrote
You're expecting a lot for people to be actually reading articles here.
blitzinger t1_j4nq7a4 wrote
The audacity is astounding
Capta1n_0bvious t1_j4n73pt wrote
Thank you sir. Now I STILL don’t need to read the article.
Thesisus t1_j4nt622 wrote
I dont have time to think so I base all of my political beliefs on headlines, sound bites, and social media.
sickoplato t1_j4ow84o wrote
Tbf, why would you need training in zero gravity if you are not expecting combat in zero gravity? Expecting combat in space is close to the weaponization of it
burnerowl t1_j4o786g wrote
To be fair, only like, 10% of the article is relevant to STARCOM’s OW range… if that.
lVlouse_dota t1_j4pb4n7 wrote
Everything is for weapons. They just say it's not. It has applications for weapons.
[deleted] t1_j4qauuw wrote
[removed]
redcowerranger t1_j4qd0gs wrote
When it comes to the military, it's always for weapons in some way. This seems to be about training to do satellite maneuvers, and it mentions GPS, but this maneuver training would be the exact same for a GPS satellite as an Orbital Bombardment satellite
[deleted] t1_j4pb2hg wrote
[removed]
NikStalwart t1_j4pkeaj wrote
I am disappointed now and won't read the article out of spite.
When are we getting MAC ODPs? When?
Seattle2017 t1_j4s8hvi wrote
It's not for weapons for now. Guess what you can do if you control satellites in space: you can practice controlling them, practice running into other ones. It's weapon-adjacent.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments